• dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I was looking at his reddit account yesterday and the posts of the reddit account match the information of the article. Maybe the intent of the article is to smear him. I don’t think that him being an anarchist or previously a radical christian devalues his action.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/26/israeli-embassy-airman-fire-death-gaza/
    https://archive.ph/flTlp

    His username on twitch was lillyanarkitty when he streamed himself self-immolating. It was found that he had previously changed the name from “acebush1” using twitch moderator tools. I tried to use the tool and it said I had to buy a subscription. I’m posting the link anyway. If you have a subscription, you can see it. https://twitch-tools.lolarchiver.com/username_changelog?name=lillyanarkitty

    The username acebush1 matches his real name. Aaron BUSHnell. AceBUSH1

    On instagram, the account for acebush1 has 0 photos, 28 friends, and says “Aaron Bushnell” on the profile page. https://www.instagram.com/acebush1/

    On soundcloud, an account called acebush1 uploaded a single audio track 10 years ago. It says like: Hi I’m aaron bushnell welcome to my podcast. https://soundcloud.com/acebush1

    Based on all of that information. I believe that this was his reddit account. https://old.reddit.com/user/acebush1/

    acebush1 posted in many anarchist subreddits, posted in airforce subreddits, etc.
    2-3 years ago he posted about being a radical christian, which aligns with the headline of the article.
    He posted about hating Marxist-Leninists a few times.
    He has many posts in the airforce subreddit telling people that airforce members should be able to use their airforce healthcare for gender affirming care, ie gender transitioning. Some people on hexbear and twitter were suggesting that he might be interested in transitioning based on the username lillyanarkitty. I don’t know.
    He has many posts on different fantasy series subreddits, such as LoTR. I’m mentioning this because the WAPO article also says that he loved LOTR.
    He also had posts saying that he had read anarchist literature, so he probably didn’t become an anarchist from reading memes.

    Is the washington post article trying to smear him? maybe. probably yes.

    Was Aaron Bushnel an anarchist? based on his twitch username that he streamed himself being named “lillyanarkitty” and his alleged reddit account. I would say he was an anarchist.

    Does this devalue his message at all? No. He is correct about Gaza.

    edit / It looks like reddit has deleted all his posts or shadowbanned him or something. You can still see the posts on the profile but if you click “permalink” on any of his comments, it says deleted.

    • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Repeating stuff I’ve posted elsewhere, but it’s relevant. Here are my own observations from the account.

      Looks like he lost a job during early COVID and joined the military because people gotta eat. Nobody is immune to propaganda.

      His turn toward leftism was rooted in his Christianity; it appears to have started with getting properly acquainted with the real MLK.

      The works of MLK pushed him further into theory, and the hatred of the military hierarchy they were forced into cemented them as an anarchist. Some of their more recent posting history was trying to educate other enlisted on getting conscientious objector status.

      I didn’t particularly get the vibe that he was an egg (from anything other than the twitch handle), but he definitely was a loud supporter of trans rights. I assume that that led to a lot of disillusionment with his faith.

      Also, his posting history makes it clear that he has fairly recently realized his childhood was abusive.

      07

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      10 months ago

      He posted about hating Marxist-Leninists a few times.

      Doing this while being in the airforce is so weird.

      I will still support and go to bat for him/her but come the fuck on.

      • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        His comments on reddit seem pretty based otherwise. One of his comments wrt ideology:

        I would say if I have to work with non-anarchists, I would rather work with less ideologically committed folks than with dogmatic adherents of any hierarchical ideology. The “I just think social services and wealth redistribution is neat” social democrat is better (in some ways at least) than the “THE PROLETARIAT WILL BE SAVED BY THE VICTORY OF MY IDEOLOGICALLY PURE PARTY” ML. By the same token, the casual “I just like reading Lenin” ML can be better than the “Revolution is an immature and uncivilized idea, capitalism is the best system actually and just needs a few tweaks” social democrat. The difference lies in the potential for the less ideologically committed individuals to participate in anarchistic tactics and be radicalized in a libertarian direction.

        I think if he had a few more years he would have probably cooled off on the ML hate, even if he wouldn’t have become an ML himself. We all figure these things out at our own paces.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          10 months ago

          I just don’t particularly understand how you can be part of the strictest hierarchical structure that exists, understand how efficient it is and what we are fighting, and then somehow lambast MLs for wanting a strict hierarchical structure for the revolutionary party because we understand what we’re fighting against.

          It’s just so contradictory.

            • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              10 months ago

              Maybe you can think “this isn’t efficient” but anyone who thinks about it for a few minutes can see how it’s more efficient than nobody taking or giving any orders at all.

              Doesn’t have to be efficient, just has to be more efficient than the alternatives.

              If someone can come up with something more efficient I will immediately switch to it.

              • CatoPosting [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                ·
                10 months ago

                Maybe efficiency isn’t everything. Maybe you could try to see how, having grown up under one hierarchical boot, and then working inside of another, they could feel that hierarchy will always be oppressive and therefore should be struggled against.

                • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  23
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Efficiency is everything in a zero-sum war between capitalism and revolutionaries.

                  You either do shit better than them or you lose. It’s really as simple as that. The revolutionary forces need to become strong enough to overcome the defence forces of capitalism.

                  There are two ways to this:

                  1. Building a more efficient revolutionary army than the army of the state.
                  2. The army of the state becoming so resource-stretched that it becomes weaker than the revolutionary army.

                  Or most likely: A combination of the above.

                  You can try and be completely disorganised and just hope that the state collapses so fucking hard that it can’t even fight a leaderless revolution with no hierarchy. But seriously consider that that isn’t going to be allowed to happen by foreign capitalists who WILL intervene when the moment of collapse occurs if things get that bad. More likely things wouldn’t ever get that bad too, which is why you need the vanguard to begin with, to push things truly over the edge, to place a thumb on the scales.

            • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              Regardless it’s very evident it would smear every anarcho-commune on earth in a millisecond if it felt like it. You cannot compete with organized imperialism with rifles and a can do attitude.

          • mar_k [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean he clearly regretted joining and felt guilty about being part of that structure, considering some of his last words were “I am an active-duty member of the United States Air Force, and I will no longer be complicit in genocide

            • newerAccountWhoDis [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              10 months ago

              In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.

              The vanguard party would be replacing the currently ruling bourgeois parties. It is a civil authority, but unlike the current system, it would represent the population.

            • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              10 months ago

              The difference is that the US military is subservient to civilian authority. In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.

              data-laughing

              Go back to sh.itjust.works.

              • imaqtpieA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Hahaha damn you guys are so soft. Everything I posted was 100% factual. You spend so much time in this echo chamber that being exposed to reality is a very jarring experience for you, and you’re not even sure how to react when confronted with it. It’s really fascinating from the outside looking in.

                I wanted to resume my mission of helping to save some of you from this vicious cycle of delusion, because as we can see from recent events, online extremist political spaces have the potential to radicalize people to the extent that they self-immolate.

                But obviously, it’s a long shot, especially if I can’t even post purely logical and factual counterpoints without them being removed. I just don’t understand how you can ostensibly believe yourself to be a part of a leftist space when even the most trivial intellectual debate is censored. I’ve always associated that kind of doublethink with conservatives.

                Isn’t it patently obvious that you have no legs to stand on when you can’t even manage to formulate a counter-argument for the fact that western militaries are generally subservient to the civilian population, while communist vanguard parties are not? That’s an incredibly fundamental aspect of Marxist Leninist theory, and you don’t even have a convincing justification ready? Disappointing.

        • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          this dude was maybe a year or two off from being an ML. Once you’re at this stage of opinion, things tend to snowball. Shoulda popped onto his stream and paid him in Twitch currency to read Blackshirts and Reds

      • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Anarchist is a bad word in America. Americans think Anarchist means “chaotic and violent”. Usually when the US media calls somebody an Anarchist, they mean that the person is an enemy of the US government, not that they read Kropotkin or something.

        The other narrative angle that the media tries to push is that he switched from one “extreme ideology” to another. The headline mentions that he grew up on a christian compound. This terminology “christian compound” is associated with cults. Americans also believe that anarchism is an extreme ideology because they can’t imagine a society without the state and they think Anarchy is chaos. The implication of the headline is that he was prone believing extreme ideologies and therefore not a logical actor.

      • cosecantphi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think it would because most Americans don’t actually know what anarchism is. The average person off the street will give you the dictionary definition of anarchy and say it’s when you have no laws and can do whatever you want. When they hear this guy was an “anarchist” they’ll instantly write him off the same way we instantly write off libertarians.

    • BovineUniversity@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Something really jarring about how he’s talking about video games and TV shows less than a week before he killed himself. Like it’s so casual and unrelated. Wonder if he’d planned back then what he was going to do?