• newerAccountWhoDis [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.

      The vanguard party would be replacing the currently ruling bourgeois parties. It is a civil authority, but unlike the current system, it would represent the population.

    • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      The difference is that the US military is subservient to civilian authority. In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.

      data-laughing

      Go back to sh.itjust.works.

      • imaqtpieA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Hahaha damn you guys are so soft. Everything I posted was 100% factual. You spend so much time in this echo chamber that being exposed to reality is a very jarring experience for you, and you’re not even sure how to react when confronted with it. It’s really fascinating from the outside looking in.

        I wanted to resume my mission of helping to save some of you from this vicious cycle of delusion, because as we can see from recent events, online extremist political spaces have the potential to radicalize people to the extent that they self-immolate.

        But obviously, it’s a long shot, especially if I can’t even post purely logical and factual counterpoints without them being removed. I just don’t understand how you can ostensibly believe yourself to be a part of a leftist space when even the most trivial intellectual debate is censored. I’ve always associated that kind of doublethink with conservatives.

        Isn’t it patently obvious that you have no legs to stand on when you can’t even manage to formulate a counter-argument for the fact that western militaries are generally subservient to the civilian population, while communist vanguard parties are not? That’s an incredibly fundamental aspect of Marxist Leninist theory, and you don’t even have a convincing justification ready? Disappointing.