In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.
The vanguard party would be replacing the currently ruling bourgeois parties. It is a civil authority, but unlike the current system, it would represent the population.
The difference is that the US military is subservient to civilian authority. In the case of a vanguard party, that strict hierarchical structure would be controlling the civilian population instead.
Hahaha damn you guys are so soft. Everything I posted was 100% factual. You spend so much time in this echo chamber that being exposed to reality is a very jarring experience for you, and you’re not even sure how to react when confronted with it. It’s really fascinating from the outside looking in.
I wanted to resume my mission of helping to save some of you from this vicious cycle of delusion, because as we can see from recent events, online extremist political spaces have the potential to radicalize people to the extent that they self-immolate.
But obviously, it’s a long shot, especially if I can’t even post purely logical and factual counterpoints without them being removed. I just don’t understand how you can ostensibly believe yourself to be a part of a leftist space when even the most trivial intellectual debate is censored. I’ve always associated that kind of doublethink with conservatives.
Isn’t it patently obvious that you have no legs to stand on when you can’t even manage to formulate a counter-argument for the fact that western militaries are generally subservient to the civilian population, while communist vanguard parties are not? That’s an incredibly fundamental aspect of Marxist Leninist theory, and you don’t even have a convincing justification ready? Disappointing.
Removed by mod
The US military is subservient to civilian authority? What.
I mean they do serve the interests of oligarchy which are civilians, so technically correct.
Hey it’s really you who wanted this genocide don’tcha know?
Removed by mod
The president famously never has any personal connections with the military
Such a laughably simple take it doesn’t warrant a response.
I’m honestly curious if you even have a narrative you tell yourselves, or if this whole server is just running on pure vibes 😂
What is the reality of the situation? Please enlighten me as to how the US military actually has authority over the civilian government.
The vanguard party would be replacing the currently ruling bourgeois parties. It is a civil authority, but unlike the current system, it would represent the population.
Removed by mod
There’s no contradiction. The people are at the very top of the hierarchy, the people except the capitalists and oligarchs that is
Removed by mod
Go back to sh.itjust.works.
Hahaha damn you guys are so soft. Everything I posted was 100% factual. You spend so much time in this echo chamber that being exposed to reality is a very jarring experience for you, and you’re not even sure how to react when confronted with it. It’s really fascinating from the outside looking in.
I wanted to resume my mission of helping to save some of you from this vicious cycle of delusion, because as we can see from recent events, online extremist political spaces have the potential to radicalize people to the extent that they self-immolate.
But obviously, it’s a long shot, especially if I can’t even post purely logical and factual counterpoints without them being removed. I just don’t understand how you can ostensibly believe yourself to be a part of a leftist space when even the most trivial intellectual debate is censored. I’ve always associated that kind of doublethink with conservatives.
Isn’t it patently obvious that you have no legs to stand on when you can’t even manage to formulate a counter-argument for the fact that western militaries are generally subservient to the civilian population, while communist vanguard parties are not? That’s an incredibly fundamental aspect of Marxist Leninist theory, and you don’t even have a convincing justification ready? Disappointing.