• LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    656
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now watch the Republican Party of “Law and Order”nominate a convicted felon to be the next president

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    466
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    To find out what rules he broke for each guilty verdict, search “trump rule 34”

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    445
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Count #1: Guilty

    Count #2: Guilty

    Count #3: Guilty

    Count #4: Guilty

    Count #5: Guilty

    Count #6: Guilty

    Count #7: Guilty

    Count #8: Guilty

    Count #9: Guilty

    Count #10: Guilty

    Count #11: Guilty

    Count #12: Guilty

    Count #13: Guilty

    Count #14: Guilty

    Count #15: Guilty

    Count #16: Guilty

      • babeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        234
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Count #17: Guilty

        Count #18: Guilty

        Count #19: Guilty

        Count #20: Guilty

        Count #21: Guilty

        Count #22: Guilty

        Count #23: Guilty

        Count #24: Guilty

        Count #25: Guilty

        Count #26: Guilty

        Count #27: Guilty

        Count #28: Guilty

        Count #29: Guilty

        Count #30: Guilty

        Count #31: Guilty

        Count #32: Guilty

        Count #33: Guilty

        Count #34: Guilty

          • babeuh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            130
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Again? Sure

            Count #1: Guilty

            Count #2: Guilty

            Count #3: Guilty

            Count #4: Guilty

            Count #5: Guilty

            Count #6: Guilty

            Count #7: Guilty

            Count #8: Guilty

            Count #9: Guilty

            Count #10: Guilty

            Count #11: Guilty

            Count #12: Guilty

            Count #13: Guilty

            Count #14: Guilty

            Count #15: Guilty

            Count #16: Guilty

            Count #17: Guilty

            Count #18: Guilty

            Count #19: Guilty

            Count #20: Guilty

            Count #21: Guilty

            Count #22: Guilty

            Count #23: Guilty

            Count #24: Guilty

            Count #25: Guilty

            Count #26: Guilty

            Count #27: Guilty

            Count #28: Guilty

            Count #29: Guilty

            Count #30: Guilty

            Count #31: Guilty

            Count #32: Guilty

            Count #33: Guilty

            Count #34: Guilty

              • citrusface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                80
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I got you.

                Count #1: Guilty

                Count #2: Guilty

                Count #3: Guilty

                Count #4: Guilty

                Count #5: Guilty

                Count #6: Guilty

                Count #7: Guilty

                Count #8: Guilty

                Count #9: Guilty

                Count #10: Guilty

                Count #11: Guilty

                Count #12: Guilty

                Count #13: Guilty

                Count #14: Guilty

                Count #15: Guilty

                Count #16: Guilty

                Count #17: Guilty

                Count #18: Guilty

                Count #19: Guilty

                Count #20: Guilty

                Count #21: Guilty

                Count #22: Guilty

                Count #23: Guilty

                Count #24: Guilty

                Count #25: Guilty

                Count #26: Guilty

                Count #27: Guilty

                Count #28: Guilty

                Count #29: Guilty

                Count #30: Guilty

                Count #31: Guilty

                Count #32: Guilty

                Count #33: Guilty

                Count #34: Guilty

              • babeuh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                31
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It flows so nicely wouldn’t you say?

                Count #1: Guilty

                Count #2: Guilty

                Count #3: Guilty

                Count #4: Guilty

                Count #5: Guilty

                Count #6: Guilty

                Count #7: Guilty

                Count #8: Guilty

                Count #9: Guilty

                Count #10: Guilty

                Count #11: Guilty

                Count #12: Guilty

                Count #13: Guilty

                Count #14: Guilty

                Count #15: Guilty

                Count #16: Guilty

                Count #17: Guilty

                Count #18: Guilty

                Count #19: Guilty

                Count #20: Guilty

                Count #21: Guilty

                Count #22: Guilty

                Count #23: Guilty

                Count #24: Guilty

                Count #25: Guilty

                Count #26: Guilty

                Count #27: Guilty

                Count #28: Guilty

                Count #29: Guilty

                Count #30: Guilty

                Count #31: Guilty

                Count #32: Guilty

                Count #33: Guilty

                Count #34: Guilty

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is going to pop into my head every time I think about the conviction. I hope you understand that. You are part of my life now.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    427
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    When the GOP sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are convicted felons.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    319
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    An earlier article said the Trump team was hoping for a hung jury.

    Guilty all 34 counts.

    Certainly was a hung jury. Hung like a horse!

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      139
      ·
      1 month ago

      In NY, even if he’s sentenced to prison, it’s up to the judge’s discretion whether he has to report to prison while awaiting appeal…and we all know he’s going to appeal.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            We’ll see on July 11th, but most likely it’s going to be some symbolic fine or gesture, but we’re not seeing this geriatric, senile old man who is also a former president, go to prison, where he would likely die as the country faces massive terrorist attacks and uprisings of dumbasses with deadly weapons, no judge in the country would do that no matter their political leaning if they at all took their job seriously and didn’t want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books.

            House arrest may be an option but that would be seen as a political attack because it would stop him from campaigning and that would go straight to supreme court, which we know how that would turn out. Judges know all this, their hands are pretty much tied.

            edit: I can’t understand this internet knee-jerk response system that plagued reddit as well as here where people will just downvote a comment to oblivion if they don’t like the possible reality it presents. You’re not exercising your critical thinking here, you’re making yourself dumber by not considering things you don’t like.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 month ago

              If your hands are tied by the corruption of others, make them do the corruption, don’t just preemptively do it for them.

            • ulkesh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sorry but if they have a spine, their hands are most definitely not tied. That’s the problem with the system as it relates to this piece of shit. Everyone makes excuses.

              Fuck that. It’s time to show that the rule of law matters no matter who the fuck you are. Maybe if he’s made an example of, Presidents will think twice before breaking the law.

              But, I agree that the GOP, probably this judge, the Supreme Court, and Congress — none of them have a spine.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Fuck that. It’s time to show that the rule of law matters no matter who the fuck you are. Maybe if he’s made an example of, Presidents will think twice before breaking the law.

                Okay I’m not against this and never said I was, I’m simply saying that this outcome where Trump goes to prison isn’t going to happen and you’re going to have to deal with it. Everyone is. That’s all. You can’t make this happen, our collective voice will not make this happen. People are getting some weird sense of unrealistic entitlement about this verdict.

                The world doesn’t work the way we want and if we could all just get that through our skulls we would make better political choices and actually start focusing on what matters which is community action and organization in your local communities and districts, the places that support, prop-up and create the political theater that we wish would go away.

                • ulkesh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The world is what we allow it to be made as. You are, of course, free to be as defeatist about this as you want. Doesn’t at all mean I can’t want or expect him to sit in prison.

                  And since when is expecting just consequences considered entitlement?

                  I, for one, will not abide Trump, Fox News, or any other propaganda machine to eat away at the rule of law just because they or others might think something is unrealistic or unfair. He is guilty of breaking laws — of this and most likely much much more, as the future and trials will ideally prove. It’s long past time he pays for it.

            • suction@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why are we so sure that Trump supporters are going to start major terrorist attacks and riots etc? Sure there will be some stragglers here and there but in general they are too stupid and too lazy to even start organising. If January 6th would have been prepared correctly on side of the police force, ie actual riot police present instead of beat cops and doormen, it would have been over in 10 minutes. If they were truly able to start shit, yesterday’s conviction should have triggered them already. It really shouldn’t keep Trump out of jail when the fear is that a Walmart fat guy in camo might shoot up a Starbucks.

              • eggmasterflex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                30 days ago

                Everyone likes to circlejerk about revolution or whatever, but for 99.9% of people in developed countries, life is too good to put it on the line.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m saying that people in positions of leadership, from judges to attorneys are not going to want to take that chance and be the ones responsible on even the remote chance that there’s any kind of civil unrest. This is regardless of the actual chances of anything happening, it’s about liability not probability.

                • suction@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t understand what you mean. They wouldn’t be liable or responsible if they just did their job.

                  They aren’t the ones who would instruct people to riot or do terrorism, which would make them liable.

                  To construct a liability or responsibility out of their duty is what the fascist side would try to do, so I have to assume you’re one of them?

                  So far I am not under the impression that the government would not do what needs to be done. I think it’s obvious that 99% of Trump supporters are just talk, and mainly talk in anonymity on the internet.

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              and didn’t want to have entire chapters written about them in the coming history books

              So what you’re saying is he’s definitely going to prison.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          I really wonder if the judge will call out Trumps behavior, the multiple gag order violations, etc. and use all that to justify a harsher sentence. One can only hope…

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      He was a former president. The prosecution would never have gone to trial without a watertight case.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, but I still didn’t expect the jury to be unanimous and especially not on all counts. Glad they were though :-)

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    1 month ago

    Conservative comments on this joyous event can be divided into three groups.

    Group 1: how dare the government do this to our golden god!?

    Group 2: this is good for Trump’s campaign for reasons

    Group 3: the demonrats are going to say mean things about us

    Note that none of these are “oh man, I might have been wrong to support him.” The complete absence of regret coupled with severe delusions around trump are more than slightly distressing in the long term.

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          75
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Remember when Clinton lost the election because the FBI didn’t find anything on her assistant’s laptop?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            82
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean she could have spent a weekend in Michigan. That was an unforced error.

            She could have addressed her relationship with Goldman Sachs, and all the other banks that fucked over the entirety of the American people during the housing crisis that she earned millions upon millions giving “speeches” to.

            She could have made an olive branch to the progressive caucus.

            She could have not said “Sit down and shut up” to BLM activists.

            There are a lot of things she could have done.

            • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              33
              ·
              1 month ago

              Or, like, hear me out, the Democrats could have not nominated her and nominated someone who isn’t strongly disliked by both sides.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think she would’ve won regardless of everything else, but it would’ve been closer. Really the mistake from the primaries is that she didn’t really try to incorporate any of Bernie’s ideas into her platform, or even work with him at all. She treated him as an opponent and obstacle, not as a rival and peer.

                This is where Biden was successful however – he didn’t dismiss Bernie nor his platform ideas. He did incorporate some into presidency, most obviously the climate change policies and student debt forgiveness where possible.

                And where I sincerely believe this difference came down to – Biden was friendly to Bernie in the Senate and made an effort to be friendly colleagues, if not work friends. Clinton didn’t. It shows the power of cooperation allying together with progressives, instead of allying together with “moderate” Republicans.

                • dudinax@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Maybe, but it happened right before the election. I observed noticeable shift in attitude. That’s not good evidence, I know, but Clinton’s polls which had been steady, took a 3% dip at the time and stayed down through election day.

                  People talked about the polls being off compared to the election, but the election matched the post-Comey polls pretty well. It’s only the polls that mixed pre-Comey data that were too high for Clinton.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              There were a lot of factors at play in 2016, and the margin was tiny. She had a lot of factors under her control that could’ve led to victory.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Voters decided against her for mishandling classified documents, right? So these same voters, who think things through with consistency and integrity, will decide against someone who stole boxes of documents and got CIA agents killed selling state secrets to Russia, right?

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Trying to run for president while having two X chromosomes was a massive error on her part as well.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everyone talks about his base as an unmoving monolith. But to get elected, he needs more than his base. He needs the fence sitters. Many of these people may be very ill informed about all the corruption in his original administration and his business dealings. This result will make a big difference to them because it’s simple to understand. He’s a convicted felon.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m making a called shot of a drop into the 40’s for July’s polling.

        He wont’ drop below 25%, ever. That’s his core. They may never support another candidate again.

        However, dropping to high 30’s low 40’s only puts Trump back to par with Biden. Hardly a W, but at lease Biden would be back in the running.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean it in a “There are still people who think gamestop is going to be a billion dollar stock” manner.

            See: https://lemmy.world/c/gamestopstock

            Cult/ Cargo cult level “They will never support another candidate again” is what I mean. They’ll write him in. They’ll have wild conspiracy theories. Not need to push. It will happen it on its own.

            I would guess its around 25-30% of Republican voters. Its the conspiracy theory mind-set cutting backwards against those that seed it. There is no undoing this.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              If Donald could please just die and they continue writing in his name for all future votes that would be great. They are the most ignorant and racist people within a party wholly committed to cultivating ignorant and racist voters.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                Thats what I’m conjecturing. This is the cohort that thought JFK was going to show up to some event or something a few months ago.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  A few months ago? Jesus Christ, I remember that dumb shit from the numerology crew and I had kinda lost track of them for a couple of years. This country would be so much better if they would throw their ballots in the trash. Here’s hoping.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        I suspect some people will mental gymnastics themselves into thinking this isn’t a serious crime, and stipulating an abstract ‘serious crime’ yields more extreme results than we’ll see as a result of this verdict.

        But a few percentage point swing in a few key states is enough to ensure a Biden victory, so it may be enough.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The fact of the matter is for a lot of white Americans it’s either support the republican nominee or those scary minorities will take over. To them, a white criminal is preferable to what they see as guliable saps at best or race traitors at worst.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The end of the article after discussing the failure of the impeachment of Clinton to actually change polls despite a difference in the hypothetical poll question before it occurred:

        “It’s possible for people to say a conviction would change their minds, but when/if [a conviction] happens, it’s possible (even likely) that it won’t matter at all."

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think “all 34 counts” is more meaningful than 33 out 34 or anything less.

      Any truly room temperature IQ folks out there can maybe see the light. Maybe.

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anecdotal… we drove through rural Ohio a few weeks ago. In several hours of travel we only saw ONE trump sign. The same place in 2016 or 2020 would have been full of them. Regardless of the impact of this, the enthusiasm is dead. There might be “maga guys” on Twitter but they’re largely disengaged in real life.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you sneak into their safe spaces online you can definitely tell they are unmotivated compared to 4-8 years ago.

        They liked Trump because he bullied others publicly. They don’t want to side with the guy currently getting bullied, goes against their survival instinct.

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        All the people in my development that had them up still have the signs from 2020 going strong… It’s still pretty split from talking with neighbors. One person near me is in business selling heavy equipment and they’re looking forward to trump because they feel they sell more equipment when republicans are in office. I guess that’s a viewpoint… For sure.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wait… But Biden passed a massive infrastructure law. There’s a lot of people who could feel like he didn’t really do anything to improve their economic outlook, but a guy who sells heavy equipment shouldn’t be one of them.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My gut feeling is there’s nothing in this world that will sway his core supporters. Those rabid mouth-breathing dumbass kool-aid drinking dipshits would disown their own children if they thought one of them voted for a democrat.

      However, I think it could sway a lot of swing voters away from Trump. In American elections for POTUS, swing voters are extremely important.

      Unfortunately, Biden is fucking up so bad on foreign policy (Gaza) that will lose Biden a lot of swing voters, too. Still anybody’s race is my guess.

      This is just all my gut. It’s hard to trust polls anymore.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anyone who gives a shit about Gaza probably should try to ensure the country doesn’t elect a Muslim Ban guy who wants to accelerate the genocide and deport anyone protesting it.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fuck off to Nick Fuentes then.

        FYI: Those leftists are right wing trolls under a false flag, exactly like those “Biden takes 100% blame for Israel’s every action” guys. They come from /pol and Telegram.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      This matters to intelligent, educated, and critically-thinking people. So, no, it doesn’t matter to his sycophants.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doubt it, but I don’t care. They are basically a cult at this point, no rational thought.

      This matters to everyone else. And it could keep him from being president again.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      It emboldens his supporters because they believe the “deep state”, “witch hunt”, “Democrats paid off the jury” etc according to social media now.

      I could see Biden dropping out of the debate also saying “I don’t debate felons”.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think a lot of his supporters are mostly burnt out on him. Even the hardliners are really just in this for the Wrestlemania storyline quality and this guy isn’t entertaining anymore, he just has legal bullshit around him, he says the same catchphrases all the time, he’s looking older and more haggard than we’ve ever seen, and conservatives are super fixated on superficial appearances.

      I don’t think we’re “safe” by any means, but I think a lot of people are going to fall off and it might make a large difference.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wish you were right. I live in Trumpistan and this will only make people like him more. The only way we can stop this madness is actually have him in an actual jail. Even then I’m not so sure.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          They can only vote once. At least until Trump wins because from then on we’ll have elections Russia-style.

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think this will only strengthen his core supporters because they’ll view him as a martyr. It might push away some people on the fence. But I think the martyrdom angle and the increased media spotlight could pull some people back in. Personally I think it probably won’t make a difference overall. All publicity is good publicity.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope, it’s just going to be more proof that he’s the guy to take on the ‘deep state’ and so on in their minds.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      It emboldens them because he already painted himself the victim, the outsider. He literally called it a witch hunt.

  • nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy crap… Did you guys read the bottom bit about Georgia voters?

    "Another man Bob, playing with his bluegrass band outside a café, was more sure. He wanted a positive outcome for Donald Trump and said a conviction would not change his mind. What would?

    “If he was convicted of murder, I’d be like that’s not a guy I want to go for!” "

    Not surprised, tbh, but I still find it ridiculous to read.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good now that he’s a convicted felon he can’t run for president just like you can’t vote, right? …right? Fuck this system.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are scenarios in which you’d support a felon running for office, it’s just this particular felon we have an issue with

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, I support keeping felons off the ballot because Republicans are the ones that stripped ex-cons of their right to vote.

        How is a criminal voting more dangerous then becoming President? That was the right wing’s justification for taking away former inmates right to vote.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          People with felonies shouldn’t have been disenfranchised. That is obviously wrong.

          That doesn’t mean you should also do something that’s wrong in response. Just because at this particular moment there would be an advantage to felons being forbidden from going on the ballot, doesn’t mean that will always hold true in the future. What happens in 20 years when the Cop City protestors try to run for elected office and are forbidden because of the bullshit charges they incurred protesting?

          • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            People with felonies shouldn’t have been disenfranchised. That is obviously wrong.

            Felon disenfranchisement did not become popular or widespread until after the Civil War. No points for guessing that the potion of the population also most like to be prosecuted for felonies just happen to be black men.

          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not doing anything wrong. I’m keeping you accountable for the damage your side has already done. If you don’t like it why don’t you restore the voting rights of ex-cons and admit it was yet another way to subvert democracy by sealing votes away from people you know will not vote for you.

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              Buddy, I like to argue with conservatives too but you genuinely will not find any on Lemmy and I am certainly not one myself.

          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So we shouldn’t hold Trump and the GOP accountable now for some hypothetical in 20 years. In the meantime the GOP continues to win elections now and for years to come because of voter suppression?

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              It’s unrealistic that we will suddenly pass a law between now and November preventing felons from holding office. It could happen after that, but then it won’t be applied to Trump, it will be applied to people on the left.

        • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Allowing a felon to run is a legitimate check and balance that the people can have against the government.

          It allows for the people to correct someone convicted of a crime by an unjust law. It allows for correcting (actual) political persecution.

          This is a healthy thing.

          That said. Fuck disenfranchisement. Directly fix that.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure felonies should be considered on a case by case basis, but there are many felons I’d have an issue with running for office, not just this particular one.

        • Wilzax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          I only have a problem with this one running because he’s the only one with a chance of winning

          • 3volver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s good bait, but I’m still not taking it. I repeat my stance, felonies should be considered on a case by case basis, but there are many felons I’d have an issue with running for office, not just this particular one.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 month ago

              “Case by case” for political office is so obviously open to corruption you shouldn’t bother with it though, and felony definitions are already weaponized as they are between drugs and protest laws.

              Hell, for that matter, isn’t a public record of convictions already your best version of a case by case system?

              Each voter can decide which crime matters to them…

              I’m probably more likely to vote for someone that caught a felony for protesting.

              • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s not case by case, but crime by crime. It should be decided on a basis of rule of law as to which specific crimes, such as those reflecting character and not just a lapse in judgement.

                Trump has many convictions reflecting on his character in this one trial.

                • zaph@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Problem with that is you can’t attack someone’s character in court unless they try to use it as a defense so there’s no way that’s getting into the constitution in our lifetimes.

              • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                weaponized

                My state has a law on the books specifying Abuse of a Sports Official as a felony. As in, “Hey you, the umpire’s a bum.”

                As you have observed, the situation has gotten quite out of hand.

              • 3volver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Practically I think that all felons shouldn’t be able to run for office given the nature of the system. Ideally it would be case by case, but yes it would be corrupted and used by those in power to stop people from running. We either need to allow felons to vote and allow felons to run for president, OR do not allow felons to vote and do not allow felons to run for president. Right now the system makes no fucking sense.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  So anyone who is caught with too much weed in a certain state?

                  Anyone who “resists arrest” at a protest?

                  No, fuck that. Felons should be able to vote and run for office, unless convicted of treason or insurrection.

                  Which Trump should be.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eugene Debs ran for president from prison. He got 3.4% of the vote.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Fuck trump, but convicted felons have to be eligible for office to prevent abuse. If all it took was a felony, any opposition leader would just have some nonsense charges brought against them to make them ineligible.

      This was also a key motivator of the war on drugs: criminalize the drugs that black people and anti-war protesters used, and they can be stripped of their voting rights.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ll personally donate $100 to the DNC (i’m poor leave me alone) if Hilary goes to every campaign stop chanting ‘lock him up’