Yeah, I don’t think that’ll make a huge difference. The minute the US stops supplying, Ukraine’s in trouble.
Yeah, I don’t think that’ll make a huge difference. The minute the US stops supplying, Ukraine’s in trouble.
She’s actually threatening the Republicans explicitly, I assumed she was going with the ‘both sides do it’ argument.
It didn’t work for me last time I tried, but yeah, it could have been fixed by now. It’s definitely the right direction to try, it’s the perfect solution for OP.
Does it work in game mode now? I thought it was only in desktop mode.
I’m sure he’ll get something. Looks like this time Trump is only looking for loyalty, his previous cabinet still had a ton of people that were only there because he felt he needed to keep McConnell happy. This time there’s going to be no ‘adults in the room’.
Took me way too long to realise OP meant the comment in the screenshot, not that there’s anything objectionable about the actual book.
They’ve been doing it for decades, and the media is always complicit. It’s like Chomsky wrote “Manufacturing Consent” specifically with Zionism in mind.
Those are rookie numbers, you’ve got to pump those up.
I mean, they settled as soon as they found this, as they knew how it would’ve played out in a trial. If you can show a judge that evidence was deleted, the judge/jury would need to assume that the missing evidence would show the guilt of that party.
The needle in the haystack part was that Vivendi were trying to bury Valve in evidence, as they assumed that they wouldn’t be able to afford to hire a bunch of Korean paralegals to go through everything. A wealthy opponent will do that in order to put you in the position where you have to choose between settling or paying a fortune to go through the evidence that may or may not contain anything useful.
Destroying evidence is a big no-no in a legal case, and would allow the judge to draw a negative inference, so I’m guessing that gave Valve the leverage to settle the case.
Your statistics don’t show that MAGA true believers would be watching 60 minutes, they just show stats for the general population.
So, you’re saying they’re watching Fox News all day every day, but tune into 60 minutes every week, which is the only thing they watch on CBS, and this is the first time there’s a 60 minutes episode that clashes with their MAGA worldview?
You think this is more likely than this just being the classic manufactured right wing outrage machine that spins up every week about whatever the right wants their base to be angry about?
So, my point was, the first time they would’ve heard about Matt Gaetz was 60 minutes, not the regular news?
That’s probably not what the DNC chair should be doing. Their focus is to kick out all the high paid consultants that keep losing them elections, and move fundraising away from billionaires so they are free to run on a popular economic message.
Thanks, Merrick Garland. Way to let a guy credibly accused of like 6 different Federal crimes (including a whole ass coup) just walk by slow walking investigations because you didn’t want to look political.
MAGA people avoid all mainstream media except 60 minutes on CBS?
And of course, the next guy that comes in thinks the mess is your fault as opposed to an expression of organisational dysfunction.
I was being sarcastic, as the human shields thing is apparently an acceptable excuse nowadays. But looks like I should’ve added an /s.
Yeah, it’s basically a requirement at this point.
Accuse Hamas of being Isis (after supporting them financially for decades), then turn around and support actual ISIS to aid in their genocide. Warms my heart to see the most moral army in action.