• LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    661
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now watch the Republican Party of “Law and Order”nominate a convicted felon to be the next president

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t forget their party of “family values” and “religious morals” candidate who slept with a porn star while his wife was recovering from giving birth to their child

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You know, on balance though, I think I’m glad that being a convicted felon doesn’t preclude one from being elected president. I’ve gone back and forth on it a lot, but I think it is for the best.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Can you elaborate? My knee-jerk reaction is to be against it, but I haven’t thought about it a whole lot and I’d be interested to know why you have decided on the opposite.

        • qantravon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          5 months ago

          It means if there was an actual politically motivated prosecution, that wouldn’t stop someone from winning. ie. If Trump had managed to make some fake charge against Biden stick in 2020, if the people still wanted Biden to be president, he could be.

          • tburkhol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think it’s a powerful statement that - despite all the structural checks & balances and systems of appeal - we consider political charges and kangaroo courts a realistic possibility. It’s not just Alito’s flags - this is a long simmering loss of faith.

            • proudblond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Having been a plaintiff in a civil case, with thankfully only money on the line, it was a real eye opener for me of how little the jurors actually get to see, and how much power a single judge has (read: a LOT). It really made me reflect on how absolutely awful and terrifying it must be to have your freedom on the line, and to witness something like I did that felt horrifyingly unfair, and know you could go to jail for it. And I know it happens, a lot, and disproportionately to black and brown folk no less.

              • tburkhol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I wonder if that is part of it. As the country has gotten less white, we hear (or maybe care) more about bias-induced injustice, and it’s harder for the declining majority to be complacent when “blame the Black guy” gets a court to give you what you want. Local, elected judges have always been a partisan nightmare, but I feel like it’s really the last 10 years, since they eliminated the filibuster for federal judges, and especially since 2017 for SCOTUS, that national courts have lost credibility.

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Let us know how you get from “politically motivated prosecution” to 12 jurors (some of which are Trump supporters) finding guilt. Convicted felons by jury trial should not be public servants and most state Constitutions clearly state that (Florida for example).

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            if there was an actual politically motivated prosecution

            Which is, of course, the unsubstantiated claim that Trump has been making.

            Despite this entire trial not being under the jurisdiction or control of his political rival.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          In this case it seems easy to be against it because a widely unpopular candidate is the one being prosecuted.

          However, allowing felons to run for office precludes the ability for the government to silence political dissidents by making up laws/falsifying evidence that they can be imprisoned for.

          The risk of a Trump presidency is still on the table, but the US can avoid situations like what happened to Navalny in Russia as well.

          In the 1920 election, Eugene Debs campaigned as the socialist nominee for president from prison, having been imprisoned for advocating draft dodging. That is the sort of candidate I would still support, even from behind bars.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Just because you’re a felon doesn’t mean you’re not a citizen and part of the country. As such, you should be able to partake in democracy in all possible ways as well.

          I really dislike this punitive mindset of completely ruining someone’s life for being convicted of a crime. People make mistakes, but we don’t want to exclude them from society, we want to reform them and bring them back in. So yeah, I think, even excluding all this political bs, that no person should have their right to vote or run taken from them.

          • proudblond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh yeah, I agree with you. I certainly think felons should have a vote. Hadn’t really occurred to me to include running for office in the same category.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You have to understand that this isn’t ironic to them. To them, this was not a legitimate trial and trumped up charges, if you’ll pardon the pun.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Right, there can’t be a legitimate trial because everything is “politicized” and “a witch hunt”.

          Weird how they can’t get DAs to bring charges against Hillary or Hunter though.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s because his supporters worship him as a new messiah and cannot conceive of him having actually committed a crime. Or they don’t care if he did or not.

        • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They don’t care if he did. I’d argue most of his supporters in the party (Mike Johnson for example) know that he is a horrible person but will support him because he has energized a dormant portion of the voting population that can help them to gain and hold power. Trump himself isn’t even that bad, he’s a useful idiot who gives immense power to far right organizations like the heritage foundation.

      • LEX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I think you’re right, none of this matters to them.They have their judges in place and everything is set up for Jan 6 II, Coup Boogaloo (but this time it will be ‘legal’).

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The guy behind me that watches fox news all day because “he needs something to help him focus” immediately started spouting fox talking points as soon as the verdict was read. My younger coworkers were like, “no way, that’s crazy” to all his bs. I just had to say, “no that’s not true. I read the jury instructions and they don’t say that.” He moved onto insisting there was no evidence and Cohen perjured himself and at that point I was already on my way out the door.

        He’s Gen x, a landlord, new York exile, classic gabagool. Ugh.

        • Noxy@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d complain to HR that that guy is making the workplace hostile, if not outright tell him to shut the fuck up, but I get that that’s not a safe option at a lot of workplaces

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Wrong. Talk to him every day. Hang out on some weekends, and become friends. Plant subtle notions of egalitarianism through your friendship and generosity. Ask him thought questions about his beliefs, but not in an accusatory manner. Teach him to actually think for himself, to keep an open mind, to seek evidence rather than faith to form convictions. Slowly show him by example what it means to be a good person who cares for their fellow human beings.

            Then you plant some drugs on him while at work, and call HR with your suspicions.

          • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Gen X here too, Lock him up!

            I think most of GenX were just crushed by the boomers, you just have to listen to GenX music to see how fatalistic and powerless they were. When Millenials came around, they started to have enough distance to the boomers to do their own thing. And i really have the highest of hopes for GenZ and beyond.

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Gen X came right after the Baby Boomers, just as Millennials didn’t run society for Zoomers, neither did Boomers run it for X’ers.

              So no, you weren’t overshadowed and made helpless by them, many of you outright relate with them just the same as I would a Zoomer.

              Gen X was the last generation to get a chance at the dream life of a family, a house, and a career. They’re institutionalised.

                • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You’re right, 30 year old boomers were ruining your life at the time, not the 70 year old politicians etc.

                  I’ll tell you about my life, every Gen X I’ve ever met is closer to a Boomer than a Millenial in their mindset. Even the lefter ones who went and volunteered in some developing country and did all pretend make the world better shit.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe the phrase “trumped up charges” will have new meaning after today