• 5 Posts
  • 1.66K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 14th, 2023

help-circle








  • While eroding the body of actual practitioners that are necessary to train the thing properly in the first place.

    It’s not simply that the bots will take your job. It that was all, I wouldn’t really see that as a problem with AI so much as a problem with using employment to allocate life-sustaining resources.

    But if we’re willingly training ourselves to remix old solutions to old problems instead of learning the reasoning behind those solutions, we’ll have a hard time making big, non-incremental changes to form new solutions for new problems.

    It’s a really bad strategy for a generation that absolutely must solve climate change or perish.


  • kibiz0r@midwest.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Welllll… everything in software development is trade-offs.

    It’s honestly pretty rare that one solution is unequivocally “better” than another, across every dimension you might care about (which includes non-technical things).

    The kinds of egregious defects you might think of as brazen incompetence or laziness are more often the result of everyone (technical and non-technical alike) refusing the actively pursue one side of a trade-off and hoping that the devs can just “nerd harder”.

    Technical constraints as in the case of the N64 example can actually help avoid the “just nerd harder” fallacy, because they prompt serious discussions about what you can and can’t compromise on.

    Ironically, when we sit here as users and complain about games not being optimized in this way or that, we’re also refusing to engage in a conversation about trade-offs and insisting that devs just “nerd harder”.

    Edit: That’s not to provide any excuses for the blatant financialization of the industry which prompts the whole “don’t trade off anything, just have them nerd harder” mindset… but to warn yall that even if the market wasn’t ruled by greedy suits, we would probably still be feeling like old games managed to do more with less, cuz well… trading away 500MB of bundle size so you can get better logging of resource management in production wasn’t really an option.






  • First thought: Damn, that’s crazy they went ahead and did it to get the footage even though they knew how bad it was.

    Then: Well, I guess the fishermen were gonna do it no matter what, huh?

    Wait, aren’t the fishermen worried that this footage could ruin their livelihood?

    Wait… Maybe they believe that the legality of this practice already has ruined their livelihood, and they want it to stop but can’t compete unless regulation forces everyone to stop…