I am not a teen.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    It makes sense. Sex scenes were interesting when we didn’t have on-hand porn streaming because it was something you didn’t see often. Nudity and sex are now so readily available that they aren’t exciting. As someone else said, just infer it.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s the stupid toxic “romance” that I want rid of. It gets so boring and tedious to watch. If it’s important to the story, then fine. But otherwise can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people without the need for bad relationship drama, jealousy, and normalizing the idea that when someone says no, they’re actually just “playing hard to get”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people

      Great idea. I would love a prominent TV show to have main characters of the opposite sex that are good friends and a romance is never shoehorned into it at any point.

      Warehouse 13 got sooooo close.

      • Deway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Stargate SG1 did it as well or evem better than WH13 in my opinion. Sure Jack and Sam have some sort of romance but Teal’C, Sam, and Daniel are great friends. Atlantis did it even better with Ronon and Teyla.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Yeah, but not all the characters on any show were hooking up with each other outside of soap opera stuff. There was still an idea that two of them will end up falling in love. Why does that need to be part of the show at all? Let them all have partners outside of work.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        Honestly, Law & Order is good for this imo. Especially Benson and Stabler from SVU, and some of Criminal Intent with Vincent D’Onofrio and Kathryn Erna.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My issue is that it’s almost always gratuitous now. I so rarely see a sex scene in a TV show or movie and think that it could have easily been skipped, but they felt the need to show an actress’ breasts and have her simulate an orgasm.

    I don’t get titillated by it. I have porn if I need that.

    I didn’t get past the first episode of Game of Thrones because I found all the sex and nudity too gratuitous for my tastes.

    I don’t think I’m a prude. I have no problem with sex scenes and nudity in films where they make sense. Basic Instinct wouldn’t make sense without them. Last Tango in Paris wouldn’t make sense without them. They’re both movies worth watching.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      You didn’t think it made sense in game of thrones?

      It’s olden days in a hostile world. All there is to do is have sex and die. What felt inaccurate to life about that?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        In the one episode I saw? No. It seemed almost entirely gratuitous. I don’t need to watch a prostitute sucking off Peter Dinklage to know he’s having sex with a bunch of prostitutes what with him already being in bed with them.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          I often find sex scenes to be gratuitous and unnecessary, but I would never let sex prevent me from watching an amazing TV show or movie. I think that’s just foolish.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    This new generation of kids is much more chill, educated and not sex crazed like we were. I feel like we were all boning young and being wild, getting drunk in high school. Now teens like to code, go on social media, game, etc. Going out to party and get wild is not attractive to them

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      I don’t know about coding. Don’t most gen alphas have a lower proficiency with desktop computers because they’re used to iPads and phones? I get you can code on a tablet but it would be such a pain to do it right that most wouldn’t bother doing it that way.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Lol, If someone puts a gun against my head and says guess the most lied about thing in human history, honest to god I would say, Teens lying About sex.

    For some reason I question the validity of this study.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s lot of ‘need to touch grass’ level of discourse of sex being icky these days.

      Disclaimer: Based on my infrequent visits to tumblr and related subreddits.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Absolutely. Sex is viewed as either a prideful event to be overly open about or a dark hidden secret that only one should do.

          If all we have is extremes no wonder neither side feels very interested in it. It loses the fact that it’s a thing that you just can do. It’s an action that can have lots of intent behind it and some of it is needed for procreation.
          As is now it’s too surrounded by argument.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There is porn now. Everyfuckingwhere. For free. So much porn. Niche porn. Hardcore porn. Fetish porn. You don’t have to jerk off to a lingirie catalog like we did when we were kids. Or sneak National Geographic magazines to see boobs. Sex in movies is just sad, stupid, and often unnecessary tittilation.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s this.

        I remember walking to the video rental store in the 90s to hire VCR tapes. We always tried to get that ones rated 18+ because there would be some boob stuff. Usually the attendant wouldn’t care.

        Now, fuck. Filtering porn out of my social media feeds is a daily ordeal.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So what, we’re gonna remove gore and action scenes too? I’m not saying sex scenes inherently have more “value” than any other scene, I’m not even arguing they have any “value”, but there are a lot of movies out there that are 90% “unnecessary titillation” in one way, shape, or form.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Disagree, in the world full of all sorts of sexual depictions this just feels like you’ve accidentally switched to porn - something you’re currently not intended to do and if you would, you’d look for it directly.

          It’s awkward, unnecessary and usually excessively artsy to be taken seriously, and actors might not be the kind of people you’d love to see sex scenes with.

          While I appreciate and share your look at sex as a continuation and natural part of romance, I think it is necessary to show the main part - love, devotion, trust, butterflies in the stomach - and the rest can be figured out.

          Something like “they lived happily ever after”

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            Yeah except people in relationships have sex.
            Like it just is a thing that people do for reasons of intimacy or power or excitement. There are lots of excuses for sex and just reducing life to
            "And they lived happily ever after and maybe had sex at some point
            Isn’t even the kind of stories I would want to read or watch.

            In the real world people have sex and if I want stories to feel real they are gonna do that if it feels right. Doesn’t mean it needs to be gratuitous but hiding it feels Puritan and not true to reality either.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              People in relationships also take a shit etc. Doesn’t mean we have to demonstrate it for further engagement.

              But I guess that’s a matter of preference anyway. Let’s just agree that there is no single best option.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Dunno. There are better sources too look for sex. Watching a movie with your mates is just awkward.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I can’t think of a single sex scene in a movie that added value to it. They’re pointless and akward to both the audience and actors.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not a teen (far from it), but I’m with the kids on this one. The vast majority of sex scenes in movies are awful. They’re awkward and totally unrealistic. It completely takes you out of the movie. Most sex scenes are not engrossing or engaging, they don’t immerse you in the story, they push you out of it.

    Most every sex scene feels like it was made by someone who’s never had sex. Every angle is the right angle, every thrust is ecstasy, it’s nonsense. It’s like someone who thinks the covers of romance novels are depictions of real life.

    There are a lot of intimate moments that can be portrayed convincingly enough on film, but sex is rarely one of them. And it’s just not necessary. Let the audience infer, let us use our imaginations.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      I’m sorry, but this take feels out of touch. Every shot in a movie is at the right angle. Of course they’re unrealistic. Movies are unrealistic. Sure, some try to take a more gritty, grounded approach but in general art is trying to capture the highest and lowest points of life. Obviously it’s going to be unrealistic.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      It’s just boring, and defeats the purpose of good story telling IMO. It’s either uninteresting showing very little, or it’s like porn, and when I watch a movie, I’m generally not in the mood for porn.
      If they had great sex, it may not mean the same to everybody. But if you show them at a later point, like breakfast or something, and they are glowing and smiling bigly to each other, we all know what happened, and how it went.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        There’s a really good BBC miniseries about Oppenheimer made back in the 80s with Sam Waterston in the lead role.

        On the one hand, it doesn’t have mind-blowing special effects.

        On the other hand, there’s no sex scenes in a show about the scientist who helped make the atom bomb because why would watch a TV show about him and hope to see him fucking?

        I wouldn’t even want sex scenes in a Feynman movie and he was fucking every woman who was willing. It’s just not a necessary thing to tell his story. You can show he was a horndog and not show him fucking.

        Anyway, here’s the miniseries.

        https://archive.org/details/oppenheimer1980

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have a friend who’s dated a bit but has never really had a boyfriend. I think she gives up too soon because she expects a Hallmark movie where everything’s perfect and every kiss is magical.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      One point to disagree on: less teens than ever are having sex, and with no actual experience, their imaginations are based on porn. No wonder they’re terrified of it, if their first impression is what comes up when you Google “boy girl have sex”.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Too many parents are not open with their kids about sex. I made sure my daughter understood that there’s nothing shameful about watching porn or masturbating, but she should not expect actual sex to be like what she sees in porn and she will enjoy it a lot more if she won’t have those sort of expectations.

        It’s not enough to just tell kids where babies come from. You need to tell them all sorts of things that they really need to know about sex because otherwise they’ll learn bullshit from the internet and other kids. Tell them about the things I mentioned and also about things like contraception and consent and even about kinks and why you shouldn’t feel shame or be worried if your kink involves consent all around.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If it does not serve a purpose for the plot, then it’s not needed. Simple as that.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Exactly this. A lot of media is atrocious about shoehorning in things even if they are jarring and dont make sense. Token characters (race, sexuality), token ideologies (veganism, feminism, religion, etc), stereotypes, you name it.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        People downvoting as a reactionary for making them feel bad, but I agree.

        Having a stereotype as a character for the sake of “representation” is not representing anything good and is not doing justice to anyone who would be more than a single note character.

        I’m tired of bad writing and gimmicks to get people to have a reaction to an otherwise bad story, but that doesn’t mean I want movies with none of the topics in it, I just want it to mean something when it’s there.

      • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah because everyone in media needs to be straight, white, and Christian. 🙄

        Representation matters.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          They’re saying that characters irrelevant to the plot having diverse roles feels forced. Wouldn’t you agree diverse roles should be in meaningful roles like leads?

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sure, but I get what they mean. Sometimes you have a minority character that doesn’t very much seem to interact with the plot, nor has many discernable personality trait beyond being part of a minority.

          Representation matters, but it should be done in a way that makes the characters actual people, not just a tick in a checkbox.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            And there is definitely a tokenism issue in Hollywood. There’s a reason why the “gay best friend” is a Hollywood stereotype.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Actual no holds barred sex of every sort you wish to see, as often as you wish to see it, a click away on the interwebz, the titillation found by past generations in R rated movies and late night Television, no longer computes, and is wholly unnecessary

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yea that was my thought too. When I was a teen we had one PC and it was in a shared room. Had to rely on the TV for jerk off material. These days everyone has the whole internet in their pocket. TV is for watching good stories, they can skip the sex scenes.

    • zoostation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Writing a story and having to make my characters not want to have sex because of the existence of an unrelated industry outside the context of their universe.

      Striking out any gambling references in my stories because of the rise of online gambling.

      Then I realize I’ve stupidly written scenes where my characters eat, having forgotten like a stupid hack how many restaurants there are in the real world.

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Dude, there’s a difference between romance and full-on extended sex scenes. Fade to black and get on with the plot.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            And also not necessary. You don’t need to see two people fucking to know they’re in love. I assume you don’t need to see your friends fucking to understand that they met someone they’re really into.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              What if it’s not about love? Sex can be about many things and for the sake of the story.

              Saying it only happens as the result of a perfect romance story is puritan and not beneficial to demystifying sex as an act that humans do.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 minutes ago

                And yet generally they’re romance scenes and not scenes involving lust or rape.

                I am not the one saying it. Hollywood is.

      • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Do you characters take big stinky poops? Because that’s a real thing too. Do they pop pimples on their body or on their partners? The list goes on. There’s an audience for everything, but it’s pretty obvious sex isn’t as much of a driver for movies anymore.

          • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            In what respect? I feel confident in saying many if not most people take some pleasure in a good poop. Perhaps not as much as having sex but the point remains in a critical part of life.

            • zoostation@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Drama is largely about character relationships and sex is a part of that. There’s rarely any drama to our necessary biological functions. Pooping can be part of a story’s plot like sex, just much less often.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Bowel movements are a vastly more important part of one’s life.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Right? That’s my thought. We already have a record low of sex scenes in media but people are still complaining about it?

      It’s then not about the use but some other social issue, like say social stigmas against sex by a growing authoritarian right while being an act that is performed less and less by younger people on all sides say maybe by fears of the biological outcomes of unprotected sex?

      I think it’s just stress at the thought and an avoidance tactic.