Tesla has removed Disney+ from some of its vehicles amid Elon Musk having an online fight with Disney CEO Bob Iger. The fight started when Disney halted its advertising on X after Musk agreed with and amplified antisemitic content, for which he eventually apologized.

Every week, there’s a new drama with Elon Musk on X, formerly known as Twitter. It sometimes indirectly affects Tesla, but this time, it affects it directly.

The current drama stems from Musk giving support to an antisemitic post on X, which he didn’t initially apologize for, though admitted that it was a mistake a week later. He further apologized but was already attacking Disney. In the meantime, the result was a massive backlash, where many companies stopped advertising on X, including Apple and Disney.

Musk took a particular issue with frequent right-wing target Disney – in the interview when he apologized for the tweet, he attacked advertisers for pulling out almost in the same breath.

  • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    282
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine buying an extremely expensive luxury vehicle, whose features are completely at the whim of some thin skinned billionaire.

    Just remotely turning on and off different things in your car depending on who pissed him off, or pandered to him, that week.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      LOL. Teslas cars are, for the most part, not “expensive luxury vehicles”. The brand as a whole is on par with Ford in terms of pricing. The air of luxury is yet another fallacy we cooked up in our heads with no evidence to support it; just like “Elon is a genius”.

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firmware update: vehicle now blocked from all McDonald’s drive-thru’s after Elon spilled his coffee this morning. It was hot.

      • FalseDiamond@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lawsuit you’re referring to is about a poor old woman who got second degree burns, took McD to court and won, all while being slandered by the media for being some litigation happy grifter. Just saying.

        • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am aware, yes. The injuries she got were pretty bad. The attorneys also successfully argued that McDonald’s coffee was substantially hotter than any other coffee and that the degrees of difference caused the need for skin grafts. Colder coffee would simply not have caused that severity of injury.

          But, as we all know: that doesn’t make for good headlines. So ‘woman sues over hot coffee’ is what stuck.

          • TechyDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the whole “she spilled some mildly hot coffee and got dollar signs in her eyes” narrative was cooked up by McDonald’s. They couldn’t win in court, so they tried to shape the public narrative to portray the poor woman as seeking a payday.

            In reality, she only initially wanted McDonald’s to pay her medical bills. They could have made the entire thing go away for $20,000. Instead, McDonald’s opted to spend likely millions not only on lawyers, but on a public relations campaign to defame this poor woman.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know this because someone reminds everyone every single time this lawsuit gets mentioned in any context

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, there’s probably very limited value in having a streaming service for the front display in a car anyway. The only time you’d use it is when you’ve got half an hour to kill while you’re charging on the go.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s motivated thinking, not cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the uneasy feeling when trying to balance opposing thoughts. If someone’s blindly following BS, what they are distinctly lacking, is cognitive dissonance.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, now what will I watch while autopilot launches me into the side of a truck?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          See the light as it shines on the sea It’s blinding But no one knows, how deep it goes And it seems like it’s calling out to me, so come find me And let me know What’s beyond that line, will I cross that line

          • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            See the light as it shines

            Did your granny say listen to your heart Be who you are on the inside I need three words to tear her argument apart Your granny lied! I’d rather be…

            Shiny!! Like a treasure from a sunken pirate wreck Scrub the deck and make it look…

            Shiny!! I will sparkle like a wealthy woman’s neck Just a sec!

            • don@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              [NEURALINK CHIP DETECTED, NOW MODULATING YOUR EMOTIONS TO WITHIN ACCEPTABLE LEVELS]

  • pensivepangolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Banning driving on the phone while allowing iPads to be put im dashboards shows how fucking stupid our legislators really are.

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can’t actually watch the videos while driving tho.

      I will admit I wish there were physical buttons for some things.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about watching video, it’s about having to navigate a touchpad menu while driving. I was in a car share the other day that had a screen like that, and while driving on the highway, it changed itself from the navigation screen to tire pressure information, forcing the driver to exit that inane notification and navigate all the way back to the navigation screen, again, on the highway. It’s absolutely insane.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The whole “Elon swings hard right while trying to sell electric cars” is crazy. It would be like me selling “roll coal” kits and deciding that my market had to be Progressives because I was going to insult everyone on the right.

      • Enk1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d be surprised actually now that Musk has become what they think of as a counter-culture icon. Some Trump voters out there trading in their 4WD pickups for Cybertrucks.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I was ever going to get a Tesla, this would convince me not to. It’s bad enough when cars have built in features blocked by subscriptions like heated seats, or apps removed due to contract disputes like YouTube. But having your entire car at the whim of someone like this is wild. Imagine you can’t use your GPS because you made a post he didn’t like.

    Also, is this legal? It kinda feels like extortion at least. Maybe false advertisement if it was an advertised feature.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, is this legal?

      Legal? Defintely: it’s at most a civil disagreement between corporate-preople. If it were anyone other than Elon, I’d be sure that the contracts included some kind of termination clause that lets Tesla do this, possibly by still paying Disney+, possibly by paying Disney a termination fee. Because it’s Elon, I’d say there’s probably a lawsuit incoming, just as soon as Disney Legal’s printers finish the gold leaf trim on 1000 page filing.

      • Supercritical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’re looking for more a consumer perspective. Disney will probably sue for a breach of contract, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they somehow ended up signing a TOS that allows Tesla to make changes whenever they want. From a consumer perspective, definitely legal to just remove an app. False advertising? Nah, when you buy the car/use the infotainment center, you’re agreeing to a TOS that requires you give your first born to the gigafactory they built.

        Seriously though, it’s very standard practice that a TOS includes language that the service can change in quality at any given time with no warning.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hold the fuck up, they’ve got televisions in cars?

    And we’re puzzled about why Tesla owners crash more than everyone else?

    Mystery fucking solved, boys.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s probably intended for family road trips (or just kids in general).

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t watch it while driving. It’s for watching while charging or camping or whatever

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? I’ve never seen anyone so petty. And for some reason I can’t avoid him, he’s fucking everywhere. He’s this decade’s Paris Hilton.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this is the problem with being a simple customer of one of this asshole’s businesses… you are now part of his smelly little ideological campaign, whether you like it or not…

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    as long as Musk is hurting customers on purpose for his personal vedettas I will laugh at his claims of making the earth a better place.

    the billionaire-mindset is toxicity

  • ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a Tesla model 3 owner, musk scares me on his lunatic whims that he could just fuck my car over. Only reason I got a Tesla was because it is one of the top EVs. Love my Tesla but hate musk. The company would be so much better without that deranged sad little man.