24·
2 days agoThat’s specifically why it won’t be a government agency. So they won’t be bound by any ethics rules. Make no mistake, this is not a silly one-off. This is the first step of privatizing the government.
- 0 Posts
- 156 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 21st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
He’ll have them sign something saying they were never advisors at all and he was there from the start.
7·14 days agoWould love to know the plan against this https://youtu.be/EySCQI3WEi0
5·5 months agoIs Texas going to pay for the additional wall?
20·5 months agoWould love to see AI ad recognition thrown back in their faces.
To this day I don’t know how to read Tweets in the right order. I always feel like I’m reading a Carnac joke.
Cel-Ray
4·5 months agoFujitsu Lifebook S6120 from about 2003. I…still have this in a box somewhere…
6·5 months agoPutting aside politics, macroeconomics and questions about build quality, one unavoidable answer is…because they want to. The US should get more ambitious.
2·6 months agoSly Cooper
I don’t like this.
1·6 months agoI swear I’m not just trying to start an argument, but I don’t see the disagreement here. You’re saying people here are too negative, but people aren’t shitting on the idea of LLMs, but the over promising of what they can do. You’re tired of explaining that it’s not true AI, but the confusion of caused by Google calling it “AI Overviews.”
You say it’s nothing new and that we’ve always had to vet sources when Google sends us somewhere, which is true, but the Overviews aren’t sending people anywhere, they’re summarizing and trying to give you an answer. They do link to sources for now, but the end goal is clearly that we trust the summary without following the links.
People who are listening to and parsing his comments are not the same people who will be blindly consuming these “AI Overviews.” It’s a problem.
Why do you keep touching me?