• whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s legal because they’re paying for registrations not votes, you can’t see who someone voted for just that they voted and if they registered as a party member or independent.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    can we sign up, take his money, and vote Harris?

    if a million people do this it adds up fast

    • monke🐵@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That might make it easier for him to claim election fraud. He might try to argue about how the election results don’t match with the number of people who took his money.

      • Tire@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Such a dumb argument but MAGA would 100% believe it and dash their lives against the US government to make it true.

  • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 hours ago

    the guy who famously never pays his vendors or his rent until he gets evicted is promising to send money?
    wow sign me up…

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, say you like trump, sign this and that, …

      then maybe, I mean who knows right? Maybe get paid. Donald always pays his debts so why shouldn’t his helper do it too?

      Right?

  • GottaKnowYourCHKN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m going to slap the next person who tells me racism is over and everyone is treated equal.

    How the hell is this even LEGAL? This is the state of our country? Really? Blatant bribing? Corruption? And it’s STILL a close race?

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      the fucker is basically telling how he is going to cause horrible damage to americas economy yet those people still want to vote him. I wonder if they just want to destroy their country so awful people can remake it into something terrible. If they succeed, soviets will win in the end, as didnt they blatantly gloat at some point how they will destroy america from within? This whole thing has been fueled by russia from the beginning after all.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I really liked this line:

    But it’s also possible that Musk is simply doing the rich guy thing—and the classic rich tech guy thing—of walking into a new situation and assuming all of his ideas are important.

    What a chud.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Jesus titty-fucking Christ. If someone like George Soros were paying people to vote for Harris, right-wingers would be losing their collective shit and flinging it at the moon.

    The double standard is amazing.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They don’t care about truth, or consistency. They care about power. Specifically, the power of their in-group.

      Conservatism has been aptly summarized as “There must be in-groups for the law to protect but not bind, and out-groups for the law to bind but not protect.” That’s pretty much the whole thing. Conservatives are, in a kind of fundamental way, bad people. They value the in-group far too much.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The double standard is amazing.

      “Yes, but I’m right.”

      They think their collective belief in the correctness of their group identity is more important than law. This explains why right-wing politics doesn’t care about consequences.

      • GhostFaceSkrilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 minutes ago

        He can, though. In another post about Cards Against Humanity’s project, they explained how criminally easy it was to create a PAC, request and acquire voters information. They can see your registered voter information and who you’ve voted for in the past.

        Edit: Someone corrected me that they can’t see exactly who people voted for, but, they can see party affiliation, and if you voted. Going by that data, they can assume you voted for the party you’re affiliated with.

          • GhostFaceSkrilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Sorry, so they can see if you voted and party affiliation, and based on that, they are paying people more or less $, assuming affiliation to a party ment they voted for that party.

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’d like to see that source. The voter information should be limited to their registered address and what primary or caucus they voted in - not their individual votes, which are anonymized. At most, a PAC should only be able to infer (from the voter information alone) a likelihood of which political party the voter is associated with. Now, if they take that voters info and combine it with open source intelligence, social media, advertising intelligence/marketing data, they can make much better assumptions.

          At the locality level, the voter is issued a serialized ballot. The local township, city, whatever keeps a log that “voter x received ballot Y”, but that’s where the association ends. Before being tabulated (read by the optical scanning machine and dropped into a sealed chamber), an election official removes to perforated strip containing the serial number, and the voter deposits the ballot (deserialized) into the tabulator. There is no input to the tabulator to indicate which ballot, or which voter was just processed.

          The registration receipts and ballots (without serial numbers) are kept by the locality under seal for a designated retention period.

          Source: local election official

          • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I believe they said they bought more useful information from a sleazy data broker too.

          • GhostFaceSkrilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            42 minutes ago

            For some reason when I upvote posts they dissappear for me even if I search.

            The website linked that CAH made was apologize.lol and they had a FAQ section saying how they and Musk are doing this with their PACs and how it should be illegal. Looks like they changed that site too, since I first saw it a few weeks ago, I can’t find that faq section anymore

            Cards Against Humanity are paying people more or less depending on how they voted last election, according to the records they collected.

            Edit: found solution to the dissappearing upvoted posts

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Honestly, I kinda hope he can tell. I’d love for there to be a paper trail of me accepting $100 from Elon and then voting for Harris. Hell, I’d put the money toward renting a highway billboard as close to the Tesla HQ as possible showing the receipts. Fuck him.

    • NavySqueal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Highly doubt Musk will pay, also hilarious that the reason is “to protect constitutional rights” when the person who he is endorsing has 0 integrity for that asides for freedom of his own speech…

  • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I don’t know but I think that any minimally civilized country would be a crime… just saying

    PS: I forgot that the US isn’t a civilized country and they live under a plutocracy of Capital

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    You can tell capitalists are getting desperate when they start offering brides … bribes … to voters during an election

    EDIT: beautiful how a simple typo can grab people’s attention so much

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Buying votes straight up. The only way this could get any worse is if it was funded by Trump or if Trump did it himself.

    It would be hilarious if Trump asked Musk for $100 for voting Trump though

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Jesus fucking Christ literally billionaires buying elections… Will they riot? Of course not because they win with this. If Mark Cuban offered the same thing for Harris there would be blood in the streets and Fox news would be calling for his head after Trumps coronation…