• MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        100
        ·
        2 months ago

        A Gallup poll the following week revealed nearly 60 percent placed total blame on the students, while only 10 percent blamed the guardsmen (30 percent had no opinion). Means cites multiple uses of the phrase “They should have shot more of them [students]” and similar sentiments.

        • KoboldKomrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          74
          ·
          2 months ago

          Kent State (and Jackson State) should have been the moment every American was radicalized. Instead a majority proved their loyalty to the Great Satan.

        • Pandantic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          2 months ago

          Holy god, I now see why none of these assholes care about Palestinians - they think they should have just stayed in their place and accepted the harm that was happening to their people. What’s the word for that kind of mentality?

          • EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Evil. When I was a kid and blindly followed American conservatism, then liberalism, I was never able to fully buy into any of it because no matter what they say, I knew Americans - and the majority of westerners - saw me and my friends and family as subhuman to be exploited and killed. Every time I repeated some DOD talking point, there was a nagging voice in the back of my head that wanted to clarify that I didn’t support any of the callous policies, but then I realized that it left me with nothing else to support because it’s all callousness.

      • EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most Americans weren’t against the war. Most support the soldiers regardless of how they view the war. The country is simply uninterested in caring about human suffering unless it’s their baby boys in uniform, and only nominally because they can’t even bothered to do anything to help imperialists when they come home.

    • Pandantic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t that how boomers are with everything? We had to go through it, you should be forced through it too! The ones complaining about student loan forgiveness and believing you should be able to raise a family on minimum wage.

  • EstraDoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    2 months ago

    it’s nauseating how much human rights rhetoric is used to prop up the violence of capitalism. I know this is an absolutely tepid point to make on hexbear.net but like… fuck, it’s just gross

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      2 months ago

      No you’re 100% the naked hipocrisy and selfish cruelty of it never stops being revolting. I think half the reason we all shitpost so much is we’re essentially hiding in absurdity because trying to raw-dog this society after you’ve seen the rot behind the mask is too maddening.

      • EstraDoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think half the reason we all shitpost so much is we’re essentially hiding in absurdity because trying to raw-dog this society after you’ve seen the rot behind the mask is too maddening.

        you hit the nail on the head. i have to engage with the global news through shitposting because i don’t have the emotional fortitude to take it head on. Frankly, I’d be concerned if someone did have the emotional strength to take it all at face value

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is an entire thesis to be written on the parallels between internet memes, particularly since 2008, and the Dadaist and Surrealist movements that sprang from WWI.

      • Antiwork [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 months ago

        So true like I can’t go up to people and say “fuck human rights” because they’ll think I’m the one who wants to murder a bunch of college students. Fucking wild.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    "Now let’s send in some jack-booted thugs to kill some kids for the grievous sin of thinking we shouldn’t be killing kids. That way they’ll finally shut up and we can get back to sending unlimited munitions to Israel, so they can continue killing kids too (we’re going to anyway, but I don’t want it to be such a downer all the time). And may God have mercy on your child-hating soul if you even think about impeding this!

    We’re the, uh, good guys by the way."

      • assyrian@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s not exactly a controversial or very original point to say that the meaning of antisemitism has been seriously trivialized, given how often it’s been used recently to mean justifiable criticism of israel

      • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        2 months ago

        Israel has said flat out that it uses antisemitism accusations as a means to stifle criticism. Have you not seen the news since Oct. 7th? We have zionists swearing up and down that “from the river to the sea” is antisemitic for christ’s sake. It’s totally trivialized the word and given cover to actual antisemites, I’m talking real neo-nazis to spread hatred, it’s totally backfired.

          • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 months ago

            The concept is very real, and absolutely a pressing problem.

            The word becomes less and less meaningful the more zionists use it to justify blowing children to smitherines.

          • AfterthoughtC - he/ him@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Zionist are just extremely disingenuous. I read Innuendo Studio’s curious cat and every Israel apologist there just talks like they are trying to get him in a gotcha. Some examples that come to mind:
            -Keep accusing him of wanting to exterminate Israel or being in the ‘Israel should not exist’ camp when his stand has always been ‘Israel should stop being an aparthied and grant equal rights to Palestinians’
            -Accusing him of comparing Jews to nazis (more often than not is other curious cat askers on his page that are comparing Israel, not the Jews, to the nazis). Every time he says ‘Israel is conducting genocide’ these hasbara brigaders jump to accusing him of calling Jews Hitler.
            -I remember one user who after Innuendo Studios said that Israel should stop being an ethnostate/ aparthied was like ‘oh so you support soft genocide where one race mixes with another to eventually produce offspring who dont resemble their parents’. When he called this mindset out as nazi shit they, predictably, accused him of calling Orthodox Jews nazis.
            -Inventing bullshit hypothetical scenarios that are not happening right now. Like wrt the Ansar Allah blockade one asker was like ‘would you still support them if they were nazis’. Basically what he called Values-Neutral Governance in the You Go High, We Go Low Alt-Right Playbook video.

            • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              31
              ·
              2 months ago

              Israel should not exist. This is not anti-Semitic to say. Colonial projects have no legitimacy and Israel has no more right to existence than Rhodesia or Apartheid South Africa

      • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 months ago

        it has when used by anyone besides leftists. Center and right cannot distinguish between anti-zionism and anti-semitism so they cannot be trusted when they cry wolf.

          • DyingOfDeBordom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think there might be something wrong with you if you don’t look at 99% of the accusations of antisemitism being levied at people who are like “don’t genocide Palestine” and see something wrong with that

            Or like shit like jk Rowling (who wrote very antisemitic caricatures in her shitty books) calling Corbyn an antisemite. Actually I literally only ever see accusations of antisemitism when it’s being used by right wingers like her in bad faith, or zionist Jews conflating criticism of Israeli imperialism with it.

            • theposterformerlyknownasgood@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think there has to be something very wrong with you if you think that dishonest accusations of antisemitism renders the concept meaningless. This is a garbage post, and if you genuinely think that antisemitism has ceased to be a factor because of people like Podhoretz then you are also a garbage person.

      • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        Both can essentially be the case.

        In media especially, the popular use and meaning of antisemitism has been so thoroughly degraded and twisted that it’s not only largely useless, but I think should actually be a watchword for ‘more investigation of this claim is needed’.

        But that doesn’t mean that the original and accurate meaning and the thing it actually describes does not exist or is not a problem, or that we should accept it’s shameless misuse and attempted perversion.

        • BountifulEggnog [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Wasn’t the original meaning/usage nazis trying to sound smart and scientific? Maybe this is wrong of me, but I think the word needs to be scraped for something more accurate.

          • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Similarly, I am extremely grossed out by the common usage of the term “ethnic cleansing” to describe acts of violent displacement and genocide of people. It’s uncritically accepting the framing and language of the perpetrator of the crime, that they are doing a “cleansing” act by killing “unclean” people. That even leftists use the term gives me big heeby-jeebies.

            • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              idk that compound always made the “cleansing” part sound really gross to me, like a nazi was saying it and winking, rather than any association with cleanliness. If you don’t hang out with newage crystal healing weirdos you probably don’t even hear the word “cleanse” outside of the genocidal context.

              • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                the term is not used with a wink though, as a satirical critique of perpetrators of genocide. It is used straight, as a flat description of the process of “genocide lite”. Like even international legal documents will call it “ethnic cleansing” which is not appropriate whatsoever in my view, to accept the Nazi phraseology in such explicit ways

                • WideningGyro [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s weird, I have too had issues with the term, but never really thought of it in the sense of accepting the language of the perpetrator. I just hate it in the context of Palestine, where it is sort of used by libs to, as you say, soften the accusation of genocide. This of course rests on the false premise that the Israeli don’t want to outright genocide Palestinians, but simply “drive them out”, as if Palestinians were just generic “arabs” who will immediately assimilate and become Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians etc. if they flee, and not a unique people with a unique culture and a homeland - which the Israelis want to destroy and build fucking beach resorts on. It’s kind of a bullshit term for people too chickenshit to call a genocide what it is.

                  Anyway, not sure I added anything to your point, I just thought your almost etymological objection to the word was interesting. Just another reason to call a genocidal spade a genocidal spade.

          • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 months ago

            It always struck me as weird how the word calls Jews “Semites”… like what’s that about? We call bigotry against Muslims islamophobia so I don’t understand why we don’t call bigotry against Jews judeophobia.

            • BountifulEggnog [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Where it gets really weird for me is there are other semites, but you would never hear someone being called anti semitic for hating Arabs. It kinda feels like erasing them.

              Definitely agree with you on judeophobia being a better word.

              • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                quite interesting there’s no word in English that’s commonly used for hatred of Arabs. There’s islamophobia for Muslims, but not all arabs are muslims and not all muslims are arabs (See: Iranians, Chechnyans, Uighurs, Christian Palestinians, etc)

                This is something quite relevant to me as a non-practicing secular Arab Muslim (effectively an atheist). If someone were to commit a hate crime against me for looking Arab, would it be called “islamophobia”? Doesn’t seem quite accurate to what is actually at play since I don’t have a beard, don’t wear traditional Muslim garb or signifiers, if someone attacked me it’s because I’m Arab/brown/leftist not because I’m Muslim most likely.

            • Huldra [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              As far as i understand it, the usage of “semitism” originates in the accusation that jews as a diaspora organize completely separately from the nations they live in for their own benefit, basically that they are only loyal to themselves.

              This is also why it’s suggested that you never hyphenate “antisemitism”, as one word it only describes the beliefs of antisemites, while hyphenated it treats “semitism” as a legitimate force.

              • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                the -phobic suffix is used much like the -phillic suffix in sociology, it generally means “averse to X” or “attracted to X” respectively. It’s not used in the sense of an actual psychological fear, but as a sociological flat amoral description of a group being anti-X and averse to it.

                Think Hydrophobic and Hydrophillic. Rightwing groups are homophobic because they are averse to homosexuality and don’t want to interact with it, and when they come into contact with it they react negatively. Hydrophobic molecules are not “afraid” of water in a literal sense, it’s a description of their reaction to water.

              • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re right. These words don’t describe fear, they describe persecution. Framing it as fear absolves people of their active and purposeful involvement and makes them sound like victims. As if transphobia or homophobia or whatever is akin to agoraphobia. And as if targeted harm can only be done by the mentally ill.

                It also leads us to falsely conclude that the solution to bigotry is individual - reaching out and educating bigots one by one. It totally ignores the systemic causes that motivate such bigotry and how oftentimes, it’s not even bigotry! It’s just people rationally working within the ghoulish constraints that capitalism imposes which is honestly worse.

                • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  See my comment, it’s a phrase that is scientific and comes from the social sciences. It’s not about “absolving people” of sins, that’s moralism and unscientific and Liberal idealism. It’s a scientific description of a relationship between forces. You will never defeat the forces of reaction if you believe they stem from inherent evil in the souls of people instead of a materialist framework describing and addressing the root causes of the reactionary ideology

  • Highalectical@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    The more I see shit like this, the more I think the whole “unlimited genocide on the first world” is unironically a good idea.

  • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I got no quarrel with Jewish kids. When I was out in the sticks, it was actually Jewish kids who got between me and the klan-borne crackers. It’s Zionist kids that I don’t give the first fuck about; and I hope they’re violently shamed into abandoning the genocide their elders carry out.