![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/088f6b5e-f4d7-4860-95d9-e1f7728d3dd3.jpeg)
It started right after the fucking illegal creation of the state of “israel”.
arguably before that even. colonial zionism is older than the nation-state
It started right after the fucking illegal creation of the state of “israel”.
arguably before that even. colonial zionism is older than the nation-state
Palestinians have the right to defend themselves
except bitcoin is useless and these “ai” things have nonzero useful potential
if they called them bankers somebody might bail them out
the draft, yes, but the disposability isn’t only from that.
oh I read “combat” as “compulsory”
i still don’t understand how it’s doing a defense of patriarchy. i’m not even bringing edge’s intention into it. he asked about himself in reply to a comment that was already about the suffering of men under patriarchy so i’m not even sure it was derailing the way we usually mean talking about men making discussions about feminism about themselves.
Notice that, even here on Hexbear, the conversation is centered on whether misandry is real rather than ways to tackle the problems of systemic violence against women.
The OP is about these ideas not being equal, the way the tweet is written takes misandry for granted and rightly says they are not equivalent. We don’t organize on here, the “what is to be done” kinda shit is basic stuff that everybody already knows like the men here not themselves doing violence, yelling at people we should probably stop being friends with, and running our orgs so it doesn’t happen (or holding them accountable if necessary) and there’s not really any conversation to have there unless someone has a specific question about running orgs or deradicalizing someone.
i see where he asked how it applied to him, but i don’t understand how it’s silencing or a defense of patriarchy, could you elaborate?
that’s not ageism. ageism is not hiring 40 year olds at your tech startup
maybe the roof will cave in at the debate
don’t threaten me with a good time
please don’t jacket me.
yeah, and it’s worse if you’re not white.
if we do wage equality and socialism at the same time, “men” will all be better off just on the money number too.
i’ve never even seen anyone call it misandrnoir or any of the other ways you could do that portmanteau. everybody just calls it racism and maybe talks a little about intersections.
misandry isn’t a serious concept even if we could choose to use it to describe some of us having to register for the draft and so on, but the disposability of men comes from patriarchy anyway so there’s little interest in formalizing it further.
But it also means giving up higher wages
lol who’s getting high wages?
any economic damage to “men” would be far outweighed by the gains we all make under socialism outside of a small handful of people everyone on this website would kill if we could.
Removed by mod
i like that quote in a 101 sort of way, but we should be advanced enough here to clarify that men are afraid they’ll kill themselves.
Removed by mod
Biden is more genocidal than Ronald Reagan, but liberals are all last-thursdayists so it doesn’t matter.
sounds like a 1950s b-movie
debatable
unclear