• queermunist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely.

      And until that’s the case, there’s a clear double standard that benefits white people.

        • queermunist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is a bad take.

          Racial admissions existed to counter the other injustice - an imperfect solution to the inherent racism of legacy admissions.

          Now that affirmative action has ended, the injustice of legacy admissions has been made even worse. Racism is now the law.

          And it will never end.

      • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A pure merit-based approach also overwhelming benefits white people though, because they have a lot more generational income to help their kids get ahead in life.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hook me up with that generational wealth. The ATM doesn’t accept race as a condition for providing money.

            • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It really should be income/circumstance based instead of race based. Sure they’re correlated, but there’s plenty of disadvantage white people and plenty of wealthy minorities