• queermunist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely.

    And until that’s the case, there’s a clear double standard that benefits white people.

      • queermunist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is a bad take.

        Racial admissions existed to counter the other injustice - an imperfect solution to the inherent racism of legacy admissions.

        Now that affirmative action has ended, the injustice of legacy admissions has been made even worse. Racism is now the law.

        And it will never end.

    • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A pure merit-based approach also overwhelming benefits white people though, because they have a lot more generational income to help their kids get ahead in life.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hook me up with that generational wealth. The ATM doesn’t accept race as a condition for providing money.

          • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It really should be income/circumstance based instead of race based. Sure they’re correlated, but there’s plenty of disadvantage white people and plenty of wealthy minorities