Hyperloop One to Shut Down After Failing to Reinvent Transit::The company is selling assets, laying off remaining employees.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It was born to fail, because its porpoise was to delay and sabotage the California high speed train project.

        • june@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea, it wasn’t an ocean of stupid so much as Elon dangling the idea of a better alternative like the esca of an angler fish with the intention to gobble up the plans for the train project.

          • Telstarado@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            A) I applaud you for your masterful continuation of the pelagic theme of this discussion about Elon porpoisely allowing this project to flounder into Davy Jone’s locker.

            B) TIL that an anglerfish lure is called an esca and that a sufficiently literate person can seamlessly weave such an unusual word into this net of fishy discourse… Bravo!

            • ShaggySnacks
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              Never be surprised at what you may catch sight of in the ocean that is called The Internet

          • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s not even like trains are his white whale, he’s just trying to break any alternative to cars before they can catch on

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Better” he hyped up a stupid economically non viable shit so his car company can stay relevant

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          This isn’t Elon’s hyperloop. It’s a company called Hyperloop One, predominately funded by Richard Branson.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          This gets misquoted all the time.

          The purpose wasn’t to delay the high speed rail, in favor of the hyperloop.

          It was to delay/stop the high speed rail for something better as he didn’t think the existing plan was high speed enough or would be cost effective and on time. Faster high speed trains were already being built and with all the delays this would (and has) faced, it’d be even further back by the time it was finished.

          The difference there is pretty important, unless you fall into the conspiracy camp of the intent was to delay it so he could sell more cars and he actually doesn’t want anything made.

          But the goal was to stop it so they’d make it better than planned, not make a hyperloop.

          Edit: and before people reply, it’s fast enough, it doesn’t need to be the best etc etc. That’s fine if that’s your stance. I’m just saying what was actually going on, and you don’t have to agree with him.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Just because his lie was technically a slightly different one makes no matter, it was still a lie and it was still stupid that all those government regulators and legislators fell for it.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                And you think Elon Musk, the man who owns a car making company, wasn’t trying to sell more cars?

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Well, one implies malice, and the other pushing for a better more futuristic future.

                  And he has a history of pushing for an idealistic futuristic future, with pushing spacex to figure out how to land rockets or how to make a profitable EV, so ya, I’m willing to say there’s a likely chance he was honest in thinking it was a bad idea and California, the home of silicon valley and advanced technology could maybe come up with something better.

                  But we’ll never really know.

                  • dustyData@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    he has a history of pushing for an idealistic futuristic future

                    I want some of what you are having, because you have a warped perception of reality.

                    Tom Nicholas has really good essay on this topic. Musk is not a futurism proponent. He is an apocalyptic visionaire. His view is not preparing a better future for all humans, instead he’s about using tech for rich people surviving the end of the world whilst retaining their privileges. His futurism is fake.