• lexiw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Breast milk is the only milk that can be vegan. It’s all about consent.

          • PunnyName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To which authority? Because I know the milk conglomerate has been staunchly fighting for that very definition.

            The lack of consent is more viable as a disqualifier.

            • Turun@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think the main distinction is lactose. And/or the proteins that are present in milk.

              While oat milk and consorts can be used in a lot of use cases it’s not a one to one replacement and it’s dishonest to claim it is.

        • BachenBenno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically yes. But of course they would (and can’t really) do that. But you could also eat stuff like roadkill and it’s vegan. Veganism as a moral philosophy has nothing to do with food, it’s about respecting and granting animals the same rights as humans (as far as applicable, not stuff like voting).

      • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which would mean there’s the possibility of this new short horror story I just wrote:

        I noticed two new options in the dairy aisle today: human breast milk, vegan and non-vegan.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, and vegans can also be cannibals for this same reason, as long as the person consents.

      • coffinwood@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only if you define vegan as to strictly avoid any animal product (and define humans as animals). A somewhat looser Definition says to avoid animal exploitation.

        So a product made by a non-domesticised animal in a natural way - e.g. Penguin guano - could be seen as vegan. The animal produces it anyway and the product isn’t won through keeping the animal captive and / or “stealing” from it.

        After all I wouldn’t be too strict with definitions here.

        • evilgiraffe666@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most honey wouldn’t be vegan but perhaps an abandoned hive could be harvested. Or infertile eggs from an abandoned nest? Bits of sheep’s wool collected from a spiky bush?

          • door_in_the_face@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah sure. Maybe you could make the argument that humans should leave stuff like that for other scavengers who need the nutrients to survive, and instead opt for plant foods. But at those edge scenarios you would then also have to take into account the impact that plant agriculture has on wildlife. It’s quite possible that scavenging and gathering is the most vegan option, but seeing how it’s neither viable for a lot of people nor something that often comes up in daily life, it’s easier to just generalize vegan food as plant based.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can drink from a well as that just gets water straight from the ground. Which well would be full of breast milk though?