• not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “But the Democrats made us do it. It’s all their fault.” - Every Republican that has been on the news.

    Fuckin singles cunts can’t even handle their own party and want to handle the country.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds incredibly difficult to reign in a party that is only united in one thing. Opposing the democrats. Ideologically they have no unifying belief other than ‘democrats bad.’ Add to it each one of them is (not so) secretly vying for their own personal gain. It’s a wonder anything gets done with these nobs leaching off the system.

      • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. They have no plan to fall on beside using Democrats as the boogie man. I found only one of them with a back boned and went on air saying that he would never vote for someone that has been saying the election was stolen. Sadly he will likely be voted out next year for being honest.

        • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          25 Republicans publicly voted against Jim Jordan, but in a subsequent secret ballot, a whopping 122 didn’t want him as speaker

          The GOP is sick, the majority can’t even share their opinion for fear of MAGA terrorist death threats

    • Decoy321@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the real kicker here. It’s all just theatre to keep attention on themselves while they gridlock the House from doing any meaningful work. Then they’ll use it as an excuse to say Dems can’t get anything done.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember when Obama chastised his Republican Congress for failing to pass the yearly roads bill? Because they didn’t want him to get a “win” by signing it? Boy howdy! Glad those crazy times are past us!

  • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like a party that isn’t unified.

    We need more choices.

    This 2-party nonsense is bad for America.

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    The house is only 50.8% republican.

    When the senate is 50/50 they come to compromise favoring the party who has the white house/vp/tie breaking vote.

    When the house is effectively 50/50 they apparently shut the government down for weeks on end.

    The country voted 49/47 for Democrats so we will all held hostage while the minority figures out who their leader is? Even if their new leader was so great bills would have to pass the Senate (where the minority generally thinks they are too extreme) and the white house where again the opposition controls that part of the government.

    Maybe the founders weren’t all knowing after all.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow that would be something, breaking up of the GOP. Dems could rule with stable majority for next 20 years - except they would surely fuck it up somehow.

      • hh93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably the best point in time to change the constitution to remove first past the post rules wherever possible if that’s the case

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know that I would get too excited about a small, but growing, fascist movement forming its own party. Seems we’ve seen that one before, didn’t seem to work out great.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And I can’t believe I’m saying this but I’m glad that they’re holding out. The less they’re touching legislation like a bunch of conniving molesters by abusing their majority, the better.

      • Josh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s their goal. Paralyze congress, prevent funding bills and critical legislation from even being voted on, and then go to their voters and blame their failures on the “non-cooperative” democrats.

        • Red_October@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          The voters who would believe Democrats are the ones who are obstructing government, and the voters who would ever vote for anyone who isn’t a Republican, have no overlap.

  • devbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you telling me people in the same party, of a 2 party system, can have some differing opinions? crazy thought.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s the thing. The job of a Congress member is to create compromise and work for all the people. If they can’t work the most basic part of the job, what good are they?

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      So in 250+ years this has never happened, but you’re totally cool with it because it jives with some misconception you have about what’s really going on? The real reason this is happening is that the Republicans, through gerrymandering and collective cowardice, have allowed themselves to be taken over by a crazed nihilistic extremist minority. It’s not about different opinions.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doubly so when you realize “fall in line” has been their mantra for the past 30 years and the straw that broke that camels back was checks notes bipartisanship…

    • rifugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hey, there’s 2 parties, so 2 opinions. Plenty! If we had more options, we would all suffer from decision paralysis, right!? Right?

  • rainynight65@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tell them they’re not getting paid until they have elected a speaker. Watch how quickly they’ll sort themselves out.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not very quickly. How many of them are multimillionaires? Go ahead, guess. Here’s a hint.

      More than half of those in Congress are millionaires, data from lawmakers’ most recent personal financial disclosures shows. The median net worth of members of Congress who filed disclosures last year is just over $1 million. 

      They won’t care if they miss a year’s worth of paychecks if they can hurt poor people by doing so.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they make most of their money trading with their classified information.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does Congress still get paid during a government shutdown that they themselves cause? I wouldn’t be surprised, they seem to make a lot of rules that make themselves the exemption.

      • SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. It partially makes sense because you could screw the new congresspeople who aren’t corrupt with hidden income sources into not being able to afford their living situation, which could become a really bad point of leverage for awful people. I believe their staff goes without pay though.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only a majority vote is required to expel a member. The Dems would probably help too.

    Get started 😂

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good thing the Republicans have a long history of bi-partisan cooperation in the interest of a smoothly functioning government, and thus have built up a reserve of good will they can call upon to help resolve this dilemma, right?

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This .meme just encourages partisanship. Parties having locked unity seems worse for democracy than dissent.

    • when we talk policies this argument has some merit, but we are talking fundamental proceedings to enable the parliament to be able to work at all.

      if a party cannot get this straight and its members to compromise for that,then this harms democracy much more. It paralyzes and ultimately delegitimizesdemocracy as a form of government,which is precisely what the MAGA hats want.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree. I think the whole situation will force Republicans to work with Democrats because now that there’s 3 “parties,” there will have to be more compromises.

      • redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only there are no three parties, but two. Any republican who deviates from that will soon find no more support from his party for the next election cycle.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t matter they have their districts gerrymandered. You’d have to primary them.

          • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s pretty much what’s happened. Cheney, Kinziger, etc. I’m not sure what the overlap of R’s sitting in districts Biden won by a lot, but I’m guessing there aren’t many.

            I mean, this is of course the Republican parties own doing. They’ve been poking at the rabid dog that is their base for decades and accelerated further with the tea party, birther nonsense, catastrophizing a tan suit, etc, on top of their usual cries to cut education and social programs. Now they can’t control the monster they have created, which is honestly at least a little satisfying, except, you know, the whole sane people still being also trapped with the monster also part.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s how it’s supposed to work, elected officials represent their constituents not their party

        • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is something to criticize, especially so if it’s a value the Republican party admits to not caring about. It also makes the current tension all the more interesting, it’s unusual for there to not be unity

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh, no, this is not in fact how it’s supposed to work. Not even close. This is why it’s never happened before.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said representatives aren’t supposed to represent their constituents - who are they supposed to represent?

            Reality is that they frequently tend only represent their constituents enough to remain in power while focusing on representing their donors, but they should be representing their constituents - that’s literally how the model is designed and defined.