• ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      pretty sure that’s the case in the places where it has already been decriminalized or legalized outright; plus, it frees the resources and manpower that departments and agencies devote to the heinous crimes of weed possession and use.

      the police, on the other hand, would lose easy targets to detain, abuse, harass, beat up, or shoot, all while hiding behind the flimsiest excuse and the easiest lie of ‘i smelled weed’, and enjoying the benefits of qualified immunity that comes from such claims.

      • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, just about the easiest targets of all. Your average cop would much, much rather arrest a stoner in dreadlocks than bother with genuine bad guys.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t be able to pull over random black people because ‘they smelled marijuana’, and obviously every one of those was on their way to commit a crime.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          No they can’t use that excuse, because the cops are already faking fentanyl overdoses after “smelling” it and having panic attacks because they don’t actually know shit about it and believe their own propaganda.

          • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ha — I attended a neighborhood meeting several months back where a policeman spoke, and described a bust where he’d “smelled fentanyl.” It’s amazing how much they don’t know.

            • lingh0e@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s like the Battle of Wits scene in Princess Bride.

              What you do not smell is fentanyl powder.

    • tekktrix@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and so will personal property confiscations (cash, vehicles, etc) I.e. police budget bonuses

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never really heard of police/crime incidents in my hometown involving weed before or after weed became legal in Washington. So I’d assume there really hasn’t been a noticable change, which is still better than the fear mongering that crime will increase upon legalizing weed.

      • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In illegal times and places, getting busted for weed is/was so common it only made the news when celebrities are/were caught. Can’t much speak to the here and now, but I grew up in (suffice to say) an earlier decade of the illegal era, and dope busts were incredibly common.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    can we be real?

    Police training is basically a diploma mill. It’s a joke in most places. You’ve got people that barely passed high school in some cases, going to a community college with next to zero entry standards, doing this training that often contains no real legal courses.

    They don’t know shit about the subject matter.

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you consider marijuana a drug, then yeah, drug use will go up, dumbasses, that’s the point.

    If you consider marijuana use criminal, then yeah criminal activity will increase, dumbasses, that’s the point.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      well, they do have a vested interest on keeping at least the perceived crime rate high. otherwise they lose their budgets for cosplaying special forces, or even their jobs and the ‘privileges’ that go along with them.

  • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’ll let y’all know the next time the FOP manages to influence my opinions on basically anything. Oh they said it’s bad? Then it’s most likely fine and they’ve got ulterior motives.