Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Wednesday that Democrats would reject a government funding bill that Republicans wrote and passed through the House, leaving it uncertain whether Congress can avert a shutdown before Friday night’s deadline.

The House on Tuesday narrowly approved a continuing resolution to keep the government funded through the end of September.

“Funding the government should be a bipartisan effort, but Republicans chose a partisan path, drafting their continuing resolution without any input — any input — from congressional Democrats. Because of that, Republicans do not have the votes in the Senate to invoke cloture on the House CR,” Schumer said on the floor, calling for a one-month funding bill that provides more time to negotiate a deal.

“Our caucus is unified on a clean April 11 CR that will keep the government open and give Congress time to negotiate bipartisan legislation that can pass," he said. “I hope our Republican colleagues will join us to avoid a shutdown on Friday.”

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just shut it down, that’s what they want right? Show them what that really means. Shut it down and keep it close so the economy goes to shit

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Fetterman said he’s voting for it, because of course he will. Fuck that guy.

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A continuing resolution is full on fraud at this point. Trump has been halting programs authorized by law and funded by these CRs, meaning this CR is giving him money for programs that no longer exist. It’s a setup for more Trump misappropriation.

    Until Republicans hold him to account for violating the law, Democrats shouldn’t allow any funding to go through.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Fuck yeah.

    Frankly, I see very little functional difference between shutting the government down and letting the government continue to “function”, where “function” is here defined as “tear itself apart using its own goddamn funding and funnel even more of our tax money towards billionaires”.

    It’s not even valid to compare this to previous bullshit funding showdowns that the GOP has instigated, because the choice at that time was shutting the government down, or allowing itself to continue to function (traditional definition) as intended. The situation is completely unrelated, save for the fact that there’s a showdown.

    And, now that I mention it: Fuck you, news networks, for not making it crystal clear to the public that this is, in fact, a brand new situation, despite the fact that some of us have heard the words they’re saying in a similar order before.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    19 hours ago

    DO IT.

    Shut this bitch down, I know Muskrat wants it to happen with speculation that it would aid him or w/e but historically government shutdowns have always hurt Repubs. Musky is also an idiot, who thinks he’s an evil genius, so the chance it’ll entirely backfire is pretty high

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The reason he thinks it’ll help him is because the furloughed employees are called “non-essential” but in the context of a shutdown, it means “non-essential because all unfunded work has to stop” rather than “non-essential and so their positions can be eliminated.” And not every agency relies on Congress for funding so they just stay open. (Like if you pay a fee for something, there’s a good chance it’s self-funding and stays open during the shutdown.)

      This is one of the things Elon Musk apparently doesn’t understand about government.

    • Shuilishu@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But it’s always GOPers who are causing the shutdown, right? Has there been a dem shutdown?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        17 hours ago

        No, and there still won’t be because this one would also still be the GOP’s fault.

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If Dems stick to their guns on this, I’ll be well and truly surprised. 🤷‍♂️

    And, if Dems do reject bill in question, can they summon the balls to get what they should get out of doing so…?? 🤷‍♂️

    I have a bit of hope that constituents are getting through, but not much expectation given Dem’s past performance. 🙄

    • watson387@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I agree. I expect they’ll either fold or block the bill, then give Republicans everything they want in the “bipartisan” bill.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Amazing how y’all are so defeatist already. It’s truly remarkable. Why don’t we just go roll over and die eh? Skip all this nonsense.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Have you seen the Democratic Party’s track record?! They’re not exactly the party of deeds. Even when they have a majority, they can’t get anything done, because “it’s not according to The Process”(!)

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I’m alive and not buried in 6 figure debt because of the ACA.

            My brother has a legal husband because of democrats fighting for gay marriage at the state level.

            My local area had many lead pipes replaced about 18mo ago that used to carry our water supply. Take a wild guess which admin made sure that happened.

            I have a much longer list of complaints about the Democratic Party, but let’s start from a place of truth if we’re going to start critiquing them.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            You’re not wrong, but you’re wrong to say it unless it’s immediately accompanied by a call to action to force them to quit being that way.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          “It’s amazing how y’all think the stove might be hot. Just because every other time you placed your hand on it you got burned.”

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Alright I’ll ask you the same question I ask every smart ass. Let’s see if you’re the first one to actually give a real answer.

            What would you have them do?

            • reddig33@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Abstain or vote no on this budget. Don’t give an inch — vote no on anything detrimental instead of trying to bargain. Drag republicans through court cases for all these nonsense executive orders.

              • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                They don’t need the democrats to vote yes. So all the people who get mad at the Democrats for doing “virtue signaling” instead of “real things” will be unhappy. I also have to ask: what does that accomplish? What does it do?

                Got another suggestion?

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  They don’t need the democrats to vote yes

                  Filibuster. Make it go to reconciliation. Keep proposing amendments to gum up the works.

                  Now dismiss this like you dismiss anything that isn’t “do whatever republicans want.”

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Realistically, defeatism is the best way to go.

          Can do more damage getting folks’ hope up than speculating failure of leadership.

          Because if they hope, then will delay personal decisions, and some people reading the social nets have stuff coming at them soon: either with federal layoffs, frozen budgets, delayed assistance, persecution or some other.

          And basically saying leadership will follow track record will do no harm, it’s not like polls matter right now. There are no elections in the near future; and what the fallout of whatever they do will be huge, dwarfing any defeatism talk

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Uh Oh! If DEMOCRATS shut down the Government even though it’s REPUBLICANS who Refuse to Compromise then they might ANGER Republicans who would NEVER vote Democrat!

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Sure they will. I I’m willing to bet a hundred dollars that the Democrat party will have more than five across the two chambers will vote with the Republicans here.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yawn, actually do something for once, and I don’t mean limp wristed “this is not normal” cards. Sandbag the hell out of everything. Stop waiting on The Process to fix things. Things can’t be fixed anymore with courtesy. It’s too late for that!

    It’s now time for action.

    When they go low, try to find the floor! Go even lower! Fight dirty!

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Where are the guarantees that the executive branch will spend the money in the manner dictated by Congress? Leadership has lost the plot.