"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry! The unequally-sized chunks of our 6.35 oz bars are a palatable way of reminding Choco Fans and Serious Friends that the profits in the chocolate industry are unequally divided.

And in case you haven’t noticed, the bottom of our bars depicts the West African coastline. The chunks just above it represent the Gulf of Guinea. From left to right, you have Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut), Nigeria and part of Cameroon."

From https://us.tonyschocolonely.com/pages/faqs

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Some info, that’s interesting and helps balance this blatant advertisement. Tony’s was started by Dutch television maker Teun van der Keuken. He worked on a program that exposes products for their production methods and false marketing and so on. They stumbled onto the slavery that’s part of the cacao industry. He asked to be arrested for eating chocolate, and in doing so enabling slave labor, but he wasn’t. He started out Tony’s Chocolonely to attempt to change the chocolate industry. He’s not part of the company anymore. He has concluded the mission has failed, and is very critical of his former company, saying they’ve lost sight of the aim: slave-free chocolate.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m gonna be real here when I saw one of these bars for the first time I just assumed they were assholes and didn’t look any further into why the bar wasn’t cut in a usable way.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It doesn’t make any sense to do this as a metaphor. Chocolate is typically divided into evenly sized chunks for measurement purposes, regardless of the evil practices of the chocolate industry.

    The metaphor is asinine the explanation is confusing and it’s lost on almost everybody who buys this.

    I have had this brand of chocolate before and it is quite good however.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I don’t know, man. Sounds like the guy at least TRIED to do something more than most people. Granted, it doesn’t compare to a life spent delivering clever piss-take commentary to Lemmy, but not everyone can be so blessed.

      Also, speaking of asinine, measurement purposes? If they were selling unsweetened cocao bars for baking, you would have had a point.

      I’d say most people get frustrated and think WTF did they make this chocolate bar a pain in my ass? Then maybe they notice the story on the inside of the wrapper and read it?

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I have never been in or adjacent to a situation where I had to measure chocolate packaged and sold to be eaten as-is in a recipe by squares broken off of a bar, at the demarcations pre-scored into the bar. If I needed that much control I’d grate it or use a chocolate that came pre-granulated, like baking kisses.

      For chocolate bars meant to be eaten, the score lines are very much for sharability first. Any use of them for culinary measurement is at best a peripheral feature.

      This probably doesn’t hold true for baking chocolate. But Tony’s isn’t baking chocolate.

  • tallpaul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s also why I no longer buy it. It’s a PITA to eat.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is absolutely no difference in price between the two - i.e. a “fancy” one like this and a regular one. Both will most likely be made by machining a block of graphite and using EDM to make the actual mold. The difference in machining time wouldn’t cost more than $200 or so

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Do you also find it hilarious to use the word techno whenever somebody mentions EDM?

          One time this dude who is maybe a little autistic, possibly very autistic, made this super detailed post about all the different genres of electronic dance music. If you know anything about it, you know there’s some hyper-specific sub genres out there, and this dude took the time to not only list them all out, but verbally describe what made a piece of music fit into one genre versus all the others.

          Obviously I replied with something like “Man, I love techno.”

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They literally do, and their chocolate is a little more expensive because of it

      But they’re not Hershey or Cadbury (whoever owns them, forget the name rn), or even close to them in size, so they can’t just fix the industry all on their own

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Cadbury (whoever owns them, forget the name rn),

        Kraft, now called Mondelez

        Also Mars is the largest confectionery brand

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Ok, I was actually pretty sure Mondelez was the name but was too lazy to google it

          And I almost said mars instead of Hershey, then mistakenly thought Hershey’s owns Mars when I know Mondelez owns Hershey and so I basically listed them twice

          Don’t Lemmy right after you wake up, kids, you’ll look silly

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The “lonely” part of the name comes from how they’re the only player in the industry trying to do what they do.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Fait point, but it’s a statement about the industry as a whole, not their own production. Even if they were to distribute profits evenly over the entire production chain of their products (which I agree they probably don’t), the industry as a whole would still have this problem.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The story behind this brand is kind of wild. The company was founded when a Dutch TV program found out the horrors of the chocolate industry, specifically the child slavery at the core of the cacao bean production.

    Even today, there are practically no slavery free brands. Attempts to make them, like Tony’s, end up with chocolate farm owners messing with the system to pocket the higher price intended for them to hire people. There are a few attempts to make chocolate without slavery, but qhwn you buy a bar of chocolate in a store somewhere, you can be reasonably sure the company that made them profited off child slavery, even if they try their best not to.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love it, but I feel obligated to say

    "It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry!

    No, it makes sense. I understand, but it makes a lot more sense

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t make sense for cars to have 4 equal sized wheels when there is so much inequality in the auto industry.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok but this is a good way to raise awareness about the issue. Many people will pick these bars in the store without knowing much about the brand. Then when they eat it, they will probably wonder why it’s divided like that and the explanation is right there on the inside of the wrapper.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        And then never buy them again because they are difficult to break evenly. Great idea but poor execution imo.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Do you buy chocolate based on convenience over taste?

            • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              My internal chocolate bar cost has gone way up. I find the stuff at the bottom (like the stuff at the checkout) doesn’t even taste like chocolate anymore. I usually get something from the specialty section now.

              • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I agree. The budget snack items like chocolate, chips and so on have, in my opinion, lost a lot of quality; they taste a lot greasier, have worse “mouth-feel”, or are just sugar with less aroma depending on the product. I also buy less, but higher quality stuff now in comparison to 20 years ago. (Central Europe here)

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fair, I do remember eating a lot of Tesco Value chocolate back in the day

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          lol imagine sharing your chocolate bars with other people, tssk (/hj)

          fr tho if that bothers you, the inequality that comes with other chocolate brands should bother you too

          not saying Tony’s is 100% fair, but at least they put in a lot of effort to make it as fair as possible

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            When did I ever say anything against that or that I am ok with slavery?? I even mentioned it as a good idea but with that execution, you will be cutting your own sales. At the end of the day, it’s a product for consumers and if your idea, no matter how great and noble it is, compromises on the experience then you will lose customers.

            It well be cool to see for the first time but I certainly wouldn’t pick it up again if there are similar products with similar ideology on the shelf which is much easier to consumer. If this worked then good for them but I doubt it well work for long.

            Also who the hell mows down an entire bar in single sitting, is that an American thing? I usually buy a bar of dark chocolate and eat 1 piece after every meal or when I am bored/hungry. I would never pick something like this other than maybe the first time and fiddle with it every time making a mess trying to break a piece.

              • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                There are literally hundreds of them. Maybe the availability is different in your area but I can guarantee you that they are not the only one. But regardless you are missing the point.

                It’s good for a company to be ethical but if you can’t sustain a business enough to make a difference then it’s pointless. At the end of the day, a business is there to make a profit. If you ignore majority of the customers and focus on the small fraction who cares about ethical products enough to make compromise then you can’t stay float for long.

                It’s a good novel approach to raise awareness but the cost for it is too big, that was my point.

                • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Bro it’s just uneven pieces of chocolate it’s not that of a big deal. Clearly they can sustain a business because I’m encountering their products more and more often. Apparently they don’t need the support of people like you who nitpick about every little thing so go ahead and buy other brands if that’s what makes you happy.