One in three Republican voters would have preferred a different candidate to Donald Trump for the upcoming presidential election.

In March, the former president won enough primary races to secure the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election.

However, according to a survey of 1,003 Americans by Canadian polling firm Leger, Trump does not command the full support of his base and 33 percent of this demographic would have preferred another politician. Meanwhile, this proportion is higher (47 percent) among Republican voters aged 18 to 34 years old.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not the one getting a phrase generator to write my arguments then accusing the other of being a non participant.

      • Westwolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I didn’t have Chat.GPT write my arguments. I had it provide the conventional definition for the terms I was using because you, like all liberal/progressives in 2024, won’t actually argue the point, You’re just be pedantic and argue definitions. Or make other excuses. It’s pointless trying to engage with liberal/progressives. None of you understand anything about your own positions, none of you can argue of defend your positions, all you people can do is make up excuses why you don’t have to engage in real arguments while declaring yourselves “on the right side of history” and calling everyone who has a different opinion a stupid, thoughtless bigot.

        Because that’s what you are, a thoughtless bigot, incapable of making real arguments, because your entire worldview is founded on emotion and indoctrination.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You agree that defining terms is important to the argument - and then you get your definitions from ChatGPT? That’s ridiculous.

          you, like all liberal/progressives in 2024, won’t actually argue the point, You’re just be pedantic and argue definitions.

          You’re just being pedantic. See, “being” is the present participle, you’ve mistakenly used the infinitive form of be which would require a modal such as will, can, would, could, etc.

          Just kidding. Okay, so what’s your “real argument” and if you’re not a “liberal/progressive”, what are you?

          Assuming your “real argument” is “the media is liberal” then we need two definitions to start: media and liberal. If you want to have that argument, get the definitions you want from the dictionary. Merriam-Webster or OED are fine, others might work, depending.

          Because that’s what you are, a thoughtless bigot, incapable of making real arguments, because your entire worldview is founded on emotion and indoctrination.

          Ha! Prove it. Make your argument, your thesis statement, starting with a real definition, not some ChatGPT spew.