• Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A now adult woman that was only 17 years old when the incident in question happened.

      Which is clearly stated in the article that you willfully missquoted.

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        A 17 year old minor girl attended the party, a minor who was the subject of a sexual interference investigation. Referring to her current status of womanhood only serves to age her up in the mind of readers, lessening the subjective severity of the crimes.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We should start a push to publicly shame every single “journalist” that cheapens the truth like this. Even outside of sex crimes. This shit has to stop.

      Edit: if we do it enough, by name, they will start to edit these articles.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      How condescending. I assume you think a 17 year old is a child? And then the second they turn 18 they’re not?

      You can be against gaetz being creep and a groomer without thinking that 17 year olds shouldn’t be called women

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the context of sex crimes, sexual interference, and similar, journalists and others for that matter should avoid using language that “ages up” victims.