• 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think its the other way around. The simplest explanation is immediately discarded by liberal media because most of the time it’s the truth and it reveals the material reality.

    Recent examples:

    who blew up the nordstream pipeline? certainly not the US that explicitly said they would destroy it if russia ever did something against ukraine and had a material benefit destroying it, must’ve been the russians themselves to make the US look bad even though it was against their material interests!

    how did hamas pull the october 7 operation? certainly these savages couldn’t pull it off, israel is invincible! they must’ve purposefully let it happen to finally get rid of palestinians!

    liberals increasingly engage in these mental acrobatics to justify their crumbling worldview full of contradictions.

    • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah “Boeing whistleblower killed in retaliation” is a pretty simple reality, shit happens to whistleblowers all the time and it’s not irrational to assume that as a null hypothesis until proven wrong. It’s like assuming that the IOF is lying when they say something.