Excerpts:

“Seattle responded to the request by filing a lawsuit in Travis County, stating they cannot comply because Texas has no jurisdiction in Washington State, and no care was provided by the hospital in Texas. They also point out that the Dormant Commerce Clause, protected by the United States Constitution, “protects the right to interstate travel, including to obtain healthcare services.” By targeting out-of-state hospitals for enforcement of laws that only apply within the jurisdiction of Texas, they “discriminate against healthcare based on an interstate element,” violating constitutional protections, according to the legal filing. Lastly, Seattle Children’s Hospital cannot comply due to a shield law passed by Washington State. This law bars the hospital from providing any patient data and from responding to subpoenas pursuant to “protected healthcare services” obtained within the jurisdiction of Washington. Protected healthcare services include abortion, reproductive care, and gender-affirming care.”

“This case promises to be extraordinarily complex. Seattle Children’s Hospital is challenging the jurisdiction of the demands directly in a Texas state court. Regardless of what the local court decides, the claims are likely to go to the Texas Supreme Court. Given that the claims also have a time limit on them and that appeals in Texas automatically favor the attorney general due to an automatic lifting of stays in the state, Seattle Children’s Hospital workers and providers for trans patients from Texas could be under legal jeopardy. Ultimately, the case presents questions of conflicting state laws and regulation of conduct across state lines, and the implications of those laws could be dire for abortion and trans care nationwide.”

    • wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      10 months ago

      remember when they all bitched and moaned about ‘government death panels’?

      like it hadn’t been going on already at the insurance companies.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        10 months ago

        But if your insurance denies you, you can just come up with the millions of dollars you need yourself, so it’s not a death panel! /s

          • Salad_Fries@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I want (my employer) to be able to choose my death panel (without my input, based on how it affects their shareholder profits) in the free market!

            Fixed it for you ;)

    • darkstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      It makes perfect sense. It’s about control by any means. The fact of the matter is that, by definition, conservatives don’t want progress. They’ll say and do anything to stand in the way of progress, even if it’s contradictory.

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      suffering from major brain damage because they were exposed to too much lead and other harmful chemicals as children due to corporate deregulation

      As someone old enough to having played with all these wooden toys coated in shiny lead-based colors followed by plastics with even more harmful chemicals… I’m pretty sure you have to start with a lot of damage already, then develop the habit of trying to eat your toys. Which is a gateway drug to drinking bleach.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s the lead they used to put in gas that was the real problem. Up until a few decades ago basically everyone was regularly exposed to unhealthy levels of environmental lead because of leaded gas. It mostly has an impact on children so it’s really just the Boomers and older GenX who grew up exposed that are still around with lead-addled brains, instead of all of society like it used to be before the switch to unleaded gas.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          People always think that if you invent a Time Machine you should kill Hitler when he was a kid. Screw that, the man we really need to kill as a kid is Thomas Midgley Jr… Dude invented both Tetraethyllead and CFCs.

          Lead gas is also still in use! There are lots of old planes that take higher octane gas, and because rich people tend to own planes, the government allows aviation fuel to still have lead, leading to poisoning children that happen to live downwind general aviation airports. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/20/aviation-lead-fuel-00081641

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          When regular leaded gas was banned in my country I was nearly 6, 14 when the last leaded high-octane gas was sold…

          I looked up the US for reference… to find 1996 as the year leaded gas was finally banned.

          So I still don’t believe environment-induced brain damage is an excuse.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not exactly an excuse but it does explain certain things. For example, the massive drop in violent crimes that began after kids stopped growing up with too much lead in their brains.

          • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The US banned leaded gas for all cars on the road in 1996 but we phased it out much earlier. The Clean air act was passed in 1970 which created the EPA. The EPA set standards on how much carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and hydrocarbons cars could have in their exhaust. To meet those standards automakers had to use catalytic converters and leaded gas destroys catalytic converters quickly. Because of this no new car introduced in the US since 1975 has used leaded gas. It was banned about 20 years later to let the old cars be operated through their normal lifecycle. We still use lead on n some aviation fuel.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              For most of that 20 year transition, gas stations had a choice of leaded or unleaded gas. I got my license in ‘82, and never drove a vehicle that still used leaded gas