This letter was written to the Editors of the New York Times Dec. 2, 1948 – several months after the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel.

The letter was signed by Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Sidney Hook, Jessurun Cardozo, Zellig Harris, Bruria Kaufman, Irma Lindheim, Seymour Melman, Fritz Rohrlich, Stefan Wolpe, and others.

TO THE EDITORS OF NEW YORK TIMES:

Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin’s political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.

Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin’s behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement.

The public avowals of Begin’s party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village

A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants (240 men, women, and children) and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.

The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.

Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model.

During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.

The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.

Discrepancies Seen

The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a “Leader State” is the goal.

In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin’s efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.

The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.

ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ, HANNAH ARENDT, ABRAHAM BRICK, RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO, ALBERT EINSTEIN, HERMAN EISEN, M.D., HAYIM FINEMAN, M. GALLEN, M.D., H.H. HARRIS, ZELIG S. HARRIS, SIDNEY HOOK, FRED KARUSH, BRURIA KAUFMAN, IRMA L. LINDHEIM, NACHMAN MAISEL, SEYMOUR MELMAN, MYER D. MENDELSON, M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY, SAMUEL PITLICK, FRITZ ROHRLICH, LOUIS P. ROCKER, RUTH SAGIS, ITZHAK SANKOWSKY, I.J. SHOENBERG, SAMUEL SHUMAN, M. SINGER, IRMA WOLPE, STEFAN WOLPE.

New York, Dec. 2, 1948

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Likud isn’t just a continuation of Herut, they merged with the remnants of Lehi, a full on terrorist organization from before the 1949 war.

        A surviving member of Lehi then became the first leader of Likud, and his first act in power was to give all the surviving terrorists commendation medals.

        That terrorist turned prime minister was also Netenyahu’s mentor.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            And what good would that achieve? A shared state is the only way forward. Shedding blood to shed blood serves none but the bloodthirsty.

            • roofuskit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I think you’re missing that they’re parroting the prevailing Israeli attitude towards Palestinians. I doubt they were being serious, but instead as re pointing out how barbaric it is.

          • yiliu@informis.land
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            According to Zionist logic, the West would be justified in annihilating them to the last man, civilian or otherwise.

            Ah, this person is pointing out the irony of Israel defending a total war against an entire people, in the name of fighting ‘terrorism’. That’s certainly a reasonable point to–

            From the river to the sea.

            Oh wait they’re actually calling for genocide, they just disagree with the radical Israeli Right over who ought to be genocided…

    • library_napper@monyet.ccOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Right, it’s not Israel that’s terrorist – it’s just their entire military.

      Edit: oh, and most of their settlers.

      • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re entitled to that opinion. You’re not entitled to misrepresent 70 year old letters to say something they didn’t say.

        • library_napper@monyet.ccOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          The party that he was criticizing ended up megrimg into the current party that is in control of the Israeli government today (which is widely recognized as the furthest-right government of all of Israeli history)

          So I think it’s fair to say that if Einstein were alive today, he would compare the current government of Israel with the Nazi party, as he did to them in 1948

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Then make posts that say that instead of posting things with shitty clickbait titles that aren’t accurate.

            Go ahead, lemmy allows you to edit titles, so you can fix this.

            • blazeknave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              10 months ago

              Come on… you know that’s not the point. The point is all Jew bad and all Israelis for all of history are represented by current leader. You know, like how every American was a Trumper bc he scammed his way into power. Don’t expect good faith dialogue here.

              • library_napper@monyet.ccOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                10 months ago

                This has nothing to do with the population of Israel. Einstein was condemning the party now controlling the State of Israel.

                This has nothing to do with religion.

        • MooseLad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re referring to a political party in Israel not Israel itself.

          You mean the nationalist political party focused on revisionist Zionism that merged to create Likud? The party that was and is led by Netanyahu?

          You’re not entitled to misrepresent 70 year old letters to say something they didn’t say.

          Yes, Einstein was referring to that political party. But it was a nationalist zionist party that merged with a few other nationalist zionist parties, and they are currently in power and control the military and government.

          I don’t think OP is really misconstruing here, because the party still exists and is in control of the government. If I said that the United Russian Party is fascist, I’m effectively calling Russia fascist, because they currently rule Russia in a defacto one party system.