• LoftySnowman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do you use a model with pigment inks or dye inks? I currently use a pigment based hp inkjet. I thought about switching to ecotank but the pigment refills are comparable to hp pigment cost. I assume the ecotank would get a higher page count from the same cost of ink? The pigment based ecotank models I shopped around were quite a bit more expensive than the entry level dye based models.

          • teamevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I use the cheap Eko tank that doesn’t auto feed…wish I had done the auto feed. It just takes a 15 dollar bottle of ink for each color. In 4 years I’ve used one black bottle and 1/2 the colors.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve had two in the span of about 16 years. Only reason I got a new one was because I couldn’t find decent drivers for it for Windows 8. Considering with HP and Epson inkjets they wouldn’t even last 2 years, 8+ years is a good deal. Brother printers are excellent.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m at five years for ours. We used the included ‘teaser’ toner cartridge for almost three years. After the first year, it warned us the toner was low. We laughed and turned the warning off and it just continued to provide toner for nearly another two years.

        We now have an “extra large” toner cartridge. Like owning a parrot, my wife and I expect it’ll outlast both of us and our children or grandchildren will get stuck with it. We’re both 35.

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I got a huge office printing center thing from government liquidation out of my nearby military base for $55. It came with more toner than I could ever use in my lifetime.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I got a Brother with the big chonker carts, I usually only print once every 5-6 months and I’m still g2g like 5-6 years in.

      I gotta run a cleaning cycle each time usually but that’s perfectly understandable haha.

  • wosat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 months ago

    It amazes me that there are so many people who buy a printer, are offered this “pay $x a month for Y pages” type of plan, and say yes. I mean, sure, HP sucks, but they wouldn’t be able to get away with such slimy business practices if there weren’t so many people willing to pay.

    • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am obligated by my work to offer this to customers when they buy an HP printer and I make it really clear that it’s a bad deal for most customers. There are some edge case examples, like a lady with a small business who always prints exactly like 3 pages a day. The other customers who agree to buy it are almost always the super old people who don’t want to have to come to the store to get more ink. I think it’s a shit program that should be scrapped entirely, but some people really don’t care if it’s a bad deal as long as they get the convenience. No different than 7-11 up charging shit because it’s easier to buy it at the market down the street than the Walmart a few miles down the road.

    • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Spend a bit more and get a laser and have it last exponentially longer. That’s how I’ve been rollin.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I keep saying it around here - my 1996 Lexmark laser just died in July.

        Almost 30 years old. And I think I can fix it.

        • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          My cheap 300$ laser died after 8 years, so replaced it with a 600 better one. Let’s see how this goes 😂

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 months ago

    Breaking news: Printer company behaves like printer companies always have. User hostile.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you still own a HP printer, it’s your own fault. Sorry. Got an Canon with liquid refill, loved it, equipped my company with it & recommended it to everyone I know. It’s not even expensive & the quality is impeccable. Plus: no problems whatsoever over Linux.

    EDIT: CANON, not Epson. I’m distracted sometimes. Canon PIXMA G4511, sub 300 Eur.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wait till you find out it purges the lines every print, and while you can replace the purge sponge, the system doesn’t always have a “reset the purge sponge” option. And the ones that do use a rather unknown button combination that may or may not work.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      My FIL owns an HP with a subscription. I’ve given up on the things he wastes money on; most of them he’s not really technically savvy enough to implement anyway. (And, yes, buying a printer and getting it installed may exceed his technical abilities)

      • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Now I fucked it up, my finger wrote "Epson x while my brain thought “Canon”… I was talking the Canon G4511.

    • Dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I only use it for scanning now. I was mad when my parents bought a new one.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 months ago

    Being boycotting this shitstain company since Carly Fiorina turned it into a perfect example of peak 1990’s MBA management style (the kind that killed companies like GE) and, once again, I get to pat myself on the back for it.

    Almost 20 years of regular smug self-satisfaction for free is a pretty good investment.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Last time around I needed a new printer a couple of years ago, I looked around for decent inkjets and couldn’t really find any brands which weren’t undergoing enshittification, so as I only really need B&W I decided to pony up the extra money and bought a “cheap” Brother laser printer instead.

        • ratzki@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thanks, I share the same opinion, but don’t want a particle source at home for small/mid-volume printing.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        None.

        Go laser. It’s worth the difference in price.

        I have a 1996 Lexmark laser that just quit on me in July. It’s 14" wide, about 9" tall and 9" deep.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 months ago

    If like me you don’t print much but still need a printer occasionally, get a laser printer (possibly a scanner multifunction, since it can be handy to scan your receipts), and just buy your cartridges normally. Laser toner won’t dry up like ink does, so you end up paying less for your infrequent prints in the long run.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ink subscription is a bad descriptor

    You pay per page, if you have extra ink leftover then you don’t have access to it

    • blahsay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Isn’t that worse? It’s hard to say at these levels of corporate nastiness but I was surprised they could go lower

  • Brownian Motion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    At this point, I am positive the HP printer marketing department, have lost their collective minds.

    Most marketing departments are retarded, but this seems to be a new level of dumb. Bricking printers, blocking 3rd party, messing with firmware, price gouging…

    Brother are simple, reliable, low cost and dependable. Every one I have used in commercial or watched in home use have been straight up boss. I don’t own one, but it will be my next printer when the Epson runs out of ink, mark my words!

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      They do it because they can get away with it. Zero consequences, and they still have a legion of customers who are happy to piss their money down the drain on egregiously overpriced ink.

      I totally agree with you: Brother laser printers all the way.

      • harmsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        As a satisfied owner of a Brother laser printer, I can safely say I would never want anything else.

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      People keep buying them and signing up for an ink subscription. If people are that dumb, they’d be insane NOT to milk them for cash

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    HP actually has a brilliant business strategy.

    1. First get a huge customer base via cheap ass product

    2. Remove the customers who care about quality

    3. Remove the customers who care about reliability

    4. Remove the customers who care about price

    5. Remove the customers who pay attention to their monthly bills

    voila, you have like 3 people left who you can charge infinite money for a lump of shit. Infinite profit margins

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve seen a lot of recommendations for Brother, I want to add one for Ricoh.

    I bought a B/W laser printer from Ricoh (213w IIRC) a decade ago for under 40 bucks and a new generic, no-name Amazon toner refill for 25 like 5 years ago. Printed thousands of pages, just sitting in a corner under the stairs.

    Bonus: it uses Wi-Fi (so anyone in the house can print) and is compatible with generic PCL drivers in Linux.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Euuhh does nobody realize Brother has existed for like 20 years and doesn’t pull all this HP shit? They even have label printers which allow third party labels.

      There are inkjet printers now from multiple other brands which are great too and allow full refills.

      Just don’t buy HP it’s that easy.

      • PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Euuhh does nobody realize Brother has existed for like 20 years and doesn’t pull all this HP shit?

        You were right until around 2020 when Brother, too, started to roll out firmware updates outright blocking third party toners or even worse, making the printers intentionally print like crap with third party cartridges:

        https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131

        Now, that even Brother has turned to the dark side, I really don’t know what printer to recommend other than older/used Brothers with firmware updates disabled.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also, laser printers don’t dry out. Don’t need a subscription.

        “They cost money because they save money”

        My 1996 Lexmark laser just died this summer. Fortunately I inherited an HP laser (older one) with wifi. Works like a champ.

        Picked up a used color laser for $50 a couple years ago.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      With all the Big Brains at HP making up all this atrocious bullshit you’d think one of them would say “why don’t we buy all the competition like the large media companies are doing? It’s not like the US will stop us, hell they’ll give us subsidies or something.”

  • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    You know why all of the printer companies are so shitty? It’s because they’re in the business of selling printers. That’s why they break and cost so much to maintain. You know why the sewing machine company sells printers that work? Because they accidentally let some of their sewing machine engineers make printers.