• PlogLod@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    There are lots of different things that are deleted if you look at other people’s experiences with the same thing online. Reasonable criticism of governments or corporations and industries, referencing scientific studies, etc. It does not say anything the fact that I’m asking for a solution to this issue and I’m not interested in starting a debate here over the exact content that’s being removed. It does not breach any rules, it’s unproblematic, and should be allowed. If you don’t have a solution, then thanks but I’m not here to discuss why you don’t think we should be allowed to say certain things.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      How can anyone help if you won’t provide specific examples of what is being filtered? Can you provide some example comments that were filtered?

      • PlogLod@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why would you need to know what was being removed in order to suggest a character format that doesn’t get deleted? That doesn’t make sense to me. The actual content is irrelevant.

        • PlogLod@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          No one’s been able to answer this very basic question. Just downvoting with no explanation even though your logic is flawed.

          What about knowing the specific content would enable you to suggest a text character that doesn’t get removed?

          If you could suggest a text character that doesn’t get removed, then knowing the specific content, which is varied anyway, would not change your ability to suggest that text character since you would be able to suggest it anyway.