“As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now,” the staffers wrote.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not trying to be condescending. I’m just incapable of explaining this in a satisfactory way. Those criticizing the headline are not pointing out anything meaningful. The information in the article correlates with the headline. Biden has the ability to endorse a ceasefire, “while” his former staffers are urging him to do so.

      • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You are incapable of explaining it because it is an incredibly common and recognizable representation of a bad faith headline.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Summarizing an article and writing a headline isn’t easy. I know from experience. It may be in bad faith, it doesn’t appear that way to me. It doesn’t detract from the relevant information in the article.

          • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            FWIW I think the administration could, should, and (unfortunately) probably won’t do more to support a cease fire.

            I just don’t think my opinion justifies misrepresenting what actually occurred in a headline intentionally.

            And the author of the headline did. They knew. And if you have experience, you know they knew.