Windows 11 adds native support for RAR, 7-Zip, Tar and other archive formats thanks to open-source library::undefined

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Still gonna use 7zip, the default Windows packing/unpacking interface is atrocious.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Honestly though if they just added “extract to {archivename}\” as a right click option it would cover more than 90% of my usage.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Literally the reason why 7 zip is the first thing I install on a windows machine.

        All the linux file managers I use have that context menu built in, so nothing else to install 😅 except that I also sometimes use 7zip file manager via WINE because I like a GUI

      • technojamin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have you used Windows recently? This option currently exists as a right-click option in Windows 11.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I only see the “Extract All…” option which has been there for years and isn’t what I want. If it just proceeded with the extraction and didn’t pop up a window asking where to put it then we’d be in business, but as currently implemented it’s an additional interaction to do the same thing.

    • pascal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Which is an incredible effort, very few software have an interface more atrocious than 7zip.

      The UI is the main reason I actually paid for a WinRAR license.

      • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t use the interface, that’s the thing. I just use the contextual menu - which is more than enough to operate it easily. If the windows version of it had the same, then I wouldn’t mind at all.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Microsoft annonces an actually useful feature for Windows once in a blue moon basically. This is one of them.

    But I still hate Windows.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    As someone who has daily driven Linux on all my devices for about 5 years now, I actually forgot that windows didn’t have built in rar, tar and 7zip support. Absolutely bonkers that it took them this long.

  • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Microsoft loves opensource. :P

    While still using proprietary API and proprietary specs for hardware… you know the thing that gets in the way of FOSS operating systems.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Like Google and pretty much every other tech giant.

      Google are extremely keen on supporting open source when it hits their competitors but when it’s about their own business they pretty much avoids ot. They took Linux and created Android… they the practically locked it down by moving more and more essentials into Play Services… which by some of reason isn’t open source.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      They host the biggest open source platform in the world for free. So they do plenty for the open source community.

      • havokdj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Github? You mean the one that used a legally questionable AI that borrows code from projects with licenses that don’t allow you to do so under certain circumstances?

  • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    For history fans:

    LZ77 and LZ78 are the two lossless data compression algorithms published in papers by [two Israelis named] Abraham Lempel and Jacob Ziv in 1977 and 1978… Besides their academic influence, these algorithms formed the basis of several ubiquitous compression schemes, including GIF and the DEFLATE algorithm used in PNG and ZIP.

    Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LZ77_and_LZ78

  • MrFlamey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is great, but I honestly hate the way that windows treats zips like they are just folders on your computer when they are fundamentally different, and I want to do different things with them. Sure, it’s nice to be able to browse the files inside, but I can do that with 7zip.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The whole point is most people don’t want a third party app.

      I also think for most users treating them as a normal folder makes complete sense.

      Chances are you aren’t the target audience of the default configuration of windows. It’s aimed at people who have trouble checking their email.

      • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s aimed at people who have trouble checking their email.

        Opening ZIP natively in folder app really is just user friendly practices. Ofc it’s easier to able to browse its content that way.

        You shouldn’t need 3rd party software for things that simple.

        • Specal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The problem being average people don’t tend to understand what a zip file is, I regularly have to explain that you can’t run an executable from a zip

          • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can though, Windows just prompts you to extract it if needed and it’s all fairly user friendly.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Chances are you aren’t the target audience of the default configuration of windows.

        Yes. How to change it?

        • Shayeta@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pay Microsoft to the point where they make more money from you than their current target audience.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Get the majority of computer users trained to the point of understanding how computers work.

          Microsoft is just catering to their biggest market.

          • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So does KDE, XFCE, Cinnamon, Mate, Pantheon… But i can fit them infinitely more to my taste than Windows Explorer-extension (aka Windows Desktop). Well, ok, not Gnome. Not without unsupported extensions. Gnome Foundation is almost as bad in their ignorance of userbase.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe they’re like that because they’ve been trained that way by shit software

          • Knusper@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            What are you even talking about? Archives have been so much easier to use on Linux for many years, because that headline was built-in.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            What distro do you use which thinks an archive file needs executable permissions?

            Alternatively, what distro / file explorer can’t recognize the MIME types for archives (which has nothing to do with permissions but it’s the only relevant error that makes sense)?

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s nice when you can use the file browser of an app and I can open a file from a zip directly but I see your point.

      • MrFlamey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, it’s probably best for most users, but I just personally prefer to treat them separately so I know what I’m dealing with.

  • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s pretty cool. Please give us our objectively-more-efficient taskbar layouts back and I’ll consider “upgrading” my desktop?

    • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      When I was offered a free sample, win11 ran slower and controls were walled off from the control panel and access instructions were behind paywalls. Also some of my games wouldn’t play.

      • Socket462@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Me also can’t stand the changed control panel UI. Most of the times I just hit WIN+R and type “control”

      • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I have Windows 11 on my laptop but 10 on my desktop. 11 was a mess and is still a mess. Don’t get me wrong, 10, 8, 7, and Vista were that way too for like a year or two. But I feel like a lot of 11’s problems are not going to be solved by bug-fixing.

        • Socket462@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am using windows 11 since the preview both for work (dev) and for gaming (although I switched to the steam deck as my main gaming platform) and don’t remember any breaking or blocking bugs. On the contrary, using bluetooth headset got a lot better and easier with win11. Which bugs did you spot?

          • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Ech, I didn’t document them, and I don’t have a great memory for things that change. The one I remember off the top of my head were the explorer.exe crashes several times a day, and the fact that the UI still behaves freaking weirdly.

        • Zanz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          7 wasn’t really like that. It was more of a vista second edition.

          • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            7 was buggy when new like all the rest. I remember. Your argument is like saying that 10 wasn’t buggy when new because it was 8 second-edition. But it was buggy.

            • Zanz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              8.1 was fairly not buggy it was equivalent to seven. Until Windows 11 Microsoft had alternated core updates and feature updates. So XP is a less buggy version of 2000, 98 had 98se. There are a couple outliers like me and Windows 10, but Windows 10 is kind of like 8.2, and they abandoned the dos based kernels so I me never got a second version

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            A lot of the supposed technology inclined people do, when it is literally 3 clicks and a scroll away in the most obvious place to look for it.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        When the start menu was left aligned, you can move you mouse infinitely to the lower left and still click it irrespective of the initial location of the mouse (There is a term for this concept in UX design called infinite space or similar). For similar reasons, the close (x) button is in the upper right corner.

        However with the start menu in the center, you have to accurately place the mouse on the start icon and there cannot be a muscle memory since the movement depends on the initial location.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    If they’re incorporating open libraries, Hopefully support for real filesystems will be next

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Humm, I doubt it as NTFS has ACLs built in to FS directly, so far I don’t know if Linux FS has that feature, I know that ACLs exists in the Linux file world, but I don’t know if they are built in durectly in the FS.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That is fair, I confused support with making windows run on them rather than being able to just read and write to them.

          That is my mistake.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Pretty much all Linux FS support ACLs and have for an eternity.

        The thing is that nobody uses ACLs because the good ole user/group/world rwx scheme is much less of a hassle to work with in 99.9% of the cases and the remaining 0.01% can still be done.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Another actually genuine useful update, so…

    TIME TO BUY A WINRAR LICENSE!!!

    • dgsfsfda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I feel like this will only make life easier for everyone. I hate Windows as much as the next guy but this will help open archive formats be more accessible.

      • unexpectedteapot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand the sentiment, but I do not come to the same conclusion that of increasing accessibility via offering more features in unfree proprietary software. The intended consequences of this were publicised by US Justice Department in their uncovering of Microsoft’s memo labelled Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish which outlines how this eventually leads to less, not more, accessibility.

        That aside, Microsoft Windows already supported ZIP which is an open standard. The addition of RAR, which is a proprietary unfree standard, is actually less open.