• Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            yes because it’s not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

            • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

              are you taking the position of a literal child?

              • Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that’s “hierarchy”

                • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

                  state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

                  just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

                  the neck cares not the color of the boot