• Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          yes because it’s not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

          • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

            are you taking the position of a literal child?

            • Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that’s “hierarchy”

              • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

                state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

                just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

                the neck cares not the color of the boot