• Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes because it’s not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

        • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

          are you taking the position of a literal child?

          • Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that’s “hierarchy”

            • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

              state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

              just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

              the neck cares not the color of the boot