• Yezzey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well Irwin according to Wikipedia… While in 1985 the Canadian Deschênes Commission concluded that the Galicia division should not be indicted as a group.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cotler also spoke on CBC’s Sunday Show yesterday about the commission and the mood of the era that aren’t very well known and need to be brought to light. For example, it was easier for nazi war criminals to come to Canada than it was for Jewish refugees. (Reminds me of the bizarre extradition exception that made Argentina attractive for them. Sympathizers did what they could around the world, it seems.) The interview is in the very first segment. Anyone interested can listen to it here: https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-57-sunday-edition

      • Oldmandan@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, common knowledge if (and only if) you are someone chronically online and in the habit of trying to understand current events. :P

        That said, rage bait is a bit harsh; while I’m not sure there’s much to be done (the calls to deport geriatrics into an active warzone are… a little silly, even if we can prove these people to be war criminals), there are questions worth asking wrt to the circumstances and legitimacy of the rulings and descisions around both their post war status and entrance to Canada. Some acknowledgement and reckoning with some of the questionable actions taken as a nation in the aftermath of WWII is likely past due. /shurg

        • baconisaveg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That said, rage bait is a bit harsh;

          The event happened on the 22nd and I read about it on the 23rd or 24th, and at that time, I also learned about the Deschênes Commission. This is from an article 7 days ago:

          The decision to allow about 600 members of the division to live in Canada after the second world war has long been a source of controversy in Canada, and was the subject of a government commission of inquiry in the 1980s into whether Canada had become a haven for war criminals. Members of the division were accused of killing Polish and Jewish civilians. The Nuremberg tribunals found the Waffen-SS guilty as an organisation of war crimes but not the Galicia division.

          I’m in no way trying to excuse their actions, or whitewash, or whatever. My argument is the title of the article:

          An important question that has been missed. How did a veteran of the SS Galicia division end up in Canada in the first place and he was not prosecuted?

          Which is straight up bullshit; the question has been asked since the end of WW2 and has been answered several times.

          • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I barely follow any news and I knew this too, after reading a single article. I think the headline is valid to someone who only reads other headlines.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            This question need to be continued to be asked because as the recent events demonstrate, it absolutely has not been answered adequately. Releasing Deschênes Commission findings to the public would sure be a good start towards actually answering some questions.

      • blakeaholics@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yezzy didn’t make the decision to not prosecute, they stated a decision made by our government.

        Baselessly calling someone a Nazi or Nazi supporter is ridiculous for bringing up a previous ruling. Don’t be toxic and attack people, instead criticise our government for their decision and reach out to them to actually try to be useful.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is nothing baseless about calling somebody who volunteered for SS, a recognized criminal organization responsible for crimes against humanity, a nazi.

          • blakeaholics@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You were calling Yezzy a Nazi simp, saying they exposed themselves for posting about the Deschenes Commission decision. You’re ridiculous.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only people who are ridiculous here are the ones who keep trying to introduce some sort of nuance into a discussion regarding people who volunteered for SS. The fact that you keep doubling down here really says volumes.