• Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a threshold of sensationalism of such events that changes the number of states required to ratify the thing? That would change the number of supporting Congressional members?

        I’m amazed you still believe this is feasible despite the lack of support for such a measure.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The number of states required doesn’t change, but maybe people will someday realise that the number of deaths by guns in the USA is ridiculous and they’ll vote for people who want to solve the issue.

          • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            How likely is it any such shift is going to approach the 2/3 point necessary?

            I find it more likely voters will continue to reject such absurd hyperbolic appeals.