• Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a threshold of sensationalism of such events that changes the number of states required to ratify the thing? That would change the number of supporting Congressional members?

      I’m amazed you still believe this is feasible despite the lack of support for such a measure.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The number of states required doesn’t change, but maybe people will someday realise that the number of deaths by guns in the USA is ridiculous and they’ll vote for people who want to solve the issue.

        • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How likely is it any such shift is going to approach the 2/3 point necessary?

          I find it more likely voters will continue to reject such absurd hyperbolic appeals.