Coomer artists, please get to work

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, and they’re wrong. India’s pose is no more sexualized than the women in your image showing their ankles, it’s nonsense. I could point to literally any drawing of a human being and find something “sexualized” about it. I see nothing in OP that is actually evocative of sex.

        • Trudge [Comrade]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You purposefully mischaracterize what I’m saying by arguing “ankles, lol” because you don’t actually even believe in what you are saying

            • Trudge [Comrade]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              By flanderizing my statement as if I was talking about the clothing. Hence, ankles, lol. Explain what you meant by that then.

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I was extending your argument to its natural conclusion. If you can point to some random element in OP like India raising a finger and say that that’s somehow sexual, the I can do the same and point to revealing ankles as sexual. I’m not mischaracterizing your position, I’m just demonstrating why I disagree with it.

                • Trudge [Comrade]@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I was extending your argument to its natural conclusion

                  There isn’t significantly less clothing in OP’s art compared to the one I presented. Explain how it is not a bad faith interpretation.

                  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t understand why you think it’s a bad faith interpretation. I guess I don’t understand what your basis is for calling OP sexualized, as you haven’t explained what elements you find sexual. All I saw was where you contrasted the two pictures, which left me to guess which differences you found significant. I just figured you were going off vibes. Also some of the women in OP are wearing less.