• jrs100000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Military aircraft have lots of specific technical requirements that civilian planes dont deal with.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              If you are the one claiming it’s the perfect cargo plane, even better than cargo planes, it’s on you to prove it. What even is this conversation, it started you thinking cargo airplanes were civilian and then you just duck and weave on everything in the weirdest way.

              • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think the missing piece here is that B-52 isn’t just a pretty good cargo hauler, it’s a pretty good cargo hauler that we don’t need to buy a whole new airframe to get. Think of it less as “we’re commissioning these B-52s” and more as “hey look we found a way to use all these B-52s we already had” only this just keeps working forever.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Well they upgraded all the engines at some point. I don’t know the cost breakdown between engines vs frame but I don’t think it’s good.