• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Native Americans have a different claim. They are not claiming their ancestors give them the right to use the land. They have agreements with the US government. The US then promptly turned around and ignored their promises. The native Americans have the receipts.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Blood and soil nationalism is ok when it’s promoted by non-white people.

    • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even better is that the guy is 42 with no kids. I get that we all technically have ancestry that goes back to the first life on the planet, but this guy suddenly happens to have verified family lineage that goes back farther than any other human on the entire planet… And he’s the last one.
      I pray that he consciously chose not to have kids… I know how soul destroying it can be to want to have kids but not be able to. But this guy… He suddenly, because someone needed a warm body to fill out their numbers to a nice round number, is directly confronted by a family lineage 9000 years old. And he’s the last. What an absolute mind fuck.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Spouses can move to the village, it’s just that the children never leave.

        At least one parent was born in the village.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hungarian ultra-nationalists: “Since your kind was under my ancestor’s rule, you have to rejoin my country and learn my language, or else you’re a [incoherent antisemitic screaming]!”

  • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I love it when the folks attempting to talk down to everyone else don’t know how history worked or how all those lines get drawn on the map.

    🍿

    • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      your comment is ambiguous: are you insulting my opinion or the other opinion? I need to know so I can act accordingly

  • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “interesting” that op won’t commit to an actual opinion on this. Could it be they agree but are too chickenshit to say!?

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, the Native Americans have actual agreements that were made with the US government, that were then broken immediately by said government. They have the receipts. So this is a bit different.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      An appropriate response would be that Native Americans are still being oppressed, marginalized, having agreements violated, to this day, that they’re rightly due actual reparations and land back on that basis, but that the statute of limitations for these kind of claims, if you’re trying to devise some kind of universal ethical system to deal with them, may extend 100, 200, 300 years, for various types of claims, but not 2,000. And the population dynamics and methods of displacement and so on are not the same at all either, which have critical implications on who they would expect reparations from. The Palestinian people did not displace the ancient Jewish population - genetically it’s been shown that they’re the descendants of that population, religious identity notwithstanding. The Romans and other groups instigated that displacement. The Jewish groups in the diaspora are not solely descendants of that population either, they’ve intermingled with other populations, such as in Eastern Europe. Native Americans on the other hand have a direct claim against the people still occupying the land they inhabited, and I’d say have remained a more distinct group today, if you want to deal with the question of ethnic homogeneity (which is of questionable importance in the first place).

      Picture some scenario where you were going to have some kind of hypothetical international lawsuit, assuming all things were on the table in terms of what you could dedicate for reparations, and that you’re just slapping reparations onto different ethnic groups for their historic grievances. Who would the Jewish people as a whole be looking for reparations from first? The Post-WWII migration was spurred by Nazi Germany. They were alienated of their property in Europe. Germany pays some marginal form of reparations today, but for some reason the question of their compensation has been answered by depriving a completely unrelated people of their rights. What cause of action do the Jewish people have against Palestinians? None. The Palestinians today have a cause of actions against the subset of Jewish people who participated in their ethnic cleansing and genocide. The situation is not comparable to that of European settlers vs. Native Americans at all, unless you invert it to say, the Native Americans have a cause of action against European settlers for ethnic cleansing and genocide. What you are doing is inverting it into some hypothetical situation where Native Americans have performed ethnic cleansing and genocide against white people, which they have not, not in any meaningful sense. The way you have to understand these questions is that one group has been put into a lesser position of wealth and privilege than another, and that attempts to deal out justice would have to resolve that imbalance, but only to the extent that it’s reasonable and just.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        What reparations are owed to the Indigenous people of the Vietnamese highlands, perpetrated against them for centuries against the other Indigenous people of the Vietnam lowlands?

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I suspect you have better answers to that question than I do. Though the more pertinent question would probably be the reparations they’re owed from the genocide perpetrated against them by the U.S.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      The cruel reality is that humans kill and steal from each other in competition for resources and security. Doesn’t matter if it’s a bullet to the head or a dishonored agreemen. Land belongs to nobody, and whoever shows up and beats the fuck out of whoever’s there now “owns” it. It is very hard for people to look at several hundred K of years of human history and realize it’s always been this way and never will change.

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Try it and let us know how it works for you. Be sure to say it to their face in real life. 150 years is like 4 generations, that was after a sequence of attempted genocides, and then there was another two generations of trying to whitify them (fun fact, football has lots of rules because Yale attendees were soft racist little bitches who need participation trophies even 100 years ago). So yeah, let’s see what happens.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me.

        (Exodus 20:5, NKJV)

  • johsny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    So all white people in america and africa should fuck off back to europe?

    • voldage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      So, listen, I’m not making a case for all of them, but…

      Seriously though white people fucked stuff up for native americans and africans pretty hard, and just because it’s not discussed in the slightest and everyone (white people) pretend it’s not an issue, it doesn’t mean it’s not an issue. It’s less about white people though, and more about capital class that upholds the status quo, the by-product of which is the white supremacy - and that is very parrarel to the zionist claim.

      • johsny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I agree. But I think it might be time for humanity to get over this shit. We’ve been killing each other about stuff old people did years and years ago. Let’s move on and use that money and time to improve things for everybody, no matter where you live or what you look like.

        • uzay@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Part of the problem is people acting like all that stuff is ancient history and not relevant anymore. Yet almost all violent problems around the world still are directly or indirectly caused by european colonialism that destroyed societies and meddling by so-called “western” states, who felt entitled to rule over everyone they defined as “uncivilized”. On top of that these “western” states still use their influence to enrich themselves on the backs of peoples of “third world” countries and calling it “global free trade” or “spreading democracy”. If all of that isn’t acknowledged and actively counteracted, humanity won’t ever get over this shit.

          • johsny@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            As someone living in one of those third world countries, that went through all the “truth and reconciliation” stuff, the redistribution of wealth is not going too well for most of the formerly disadvantaged. At least it is fairly peaceful here, we actually have german people buying property, as a getaway hole for incase things gets too out of hand in Europe. But anyway, maybe you’re right. Honestly, I don’t really care anymore, I was mostly just being facetious with my original comment. Peace to you and yours, typing on the phone is a pain.

  • karashta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    You forgot the part where the komodo dragon’s “promised land” was full of Phoenician Canaanites they had to genocide first.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The same Canaanites from Noah’s son because after everyone was killed by a flood, God deemed Canaan’s blood the good people worth saving?

      He sure seemed to fuck it up and have to wipe out humans quite a few times. But that’s what you get for putting a tree in Eden for no other reason but to introduce sin to the innocent and trick humans into thinking Lucifer was the evil one.

      And now he loves America. Just don’t tell the Italians.

      Starting to see a pattern of bad outcomes for whoever makes a deal with this guy at the time…

  • spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The irony would be even greater if they were kicking out birds who they accused of displacing the ancient Dinosaurs.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    The problem is that this argument can really be made both ways. If someone said Israel shouldn’t exist because Palestinians used to live there before that, that’s just essentially the same argument.

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Neither argument hold any merit and is an example of the tyranny of history. Who cares what a bunch of dead assholes thought was theirs? The people who live there (not the politicians who pretend to represent their interests) are the only people that have any legitimate claim to authority on what should be done about the region.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is especially meritless to equate people who claim the land based on other people sharing their religion having lived there a thousand years ago, with people whose grandparents got kicked out of their houses and who’ve had to live in an open air prison ever since while being subjected to regular attempts at ethnic cleansing.

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Israel shouldn’t exist because it’s a colonial apartheid state perpetrating a genocide. That doesn’t mean every non-palestinian has to leave either.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      But saying that Israel shouldn’t exist doesn’t mean that the Israelis have to leave

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The area has had a population for thousands of years. The original Canaanites are the people who were still living there in 1947 when would be Israelis invited themselves to that land.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Well more like millennia. The Romans called the area Syria-Palestine. The Canaanite thing is really just to demonstrate that the Israelis weren’t the original inhabitants even in ancient history.

            • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Maybe im encroaching on a bit of history i dont know well enough, but isnt tribes of Israelites just a fancy way of saying Egyptian refugees? Deport them - I bet they even came in caravans, didn’t they?