South Western’s elected school board is making some strange decisions.

For the last two years, they’ve fixated on which bathrooms LGBTQ+ kids use. In 2023, officials in this Hanover-area district played musical chairs with school bathrooms in a misguided attempt to appease the loudest bigots among them — ending up with five different types of bathrooms.

After a low-turnout school board election in which several far-right members joined their ranks, they hired a Christian law firm, decided to begin banning books and reopened the bathroom issue. Board President Matthew Gelazela, who was elevated to his post after previously serving as the board’s most vocal bomb-thrower, pointed to Red Lion’s discriminatory policies as something to aspire to.

Now, upon the advice of that law firm — the Harrisburg-based Independence Law Center — the board approved spending $8,700 to cut windows so passersby can look into the so-called “gender-identity” student bathrooms.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    These are the people who continually call everyone on the left “groomers” and taking an unhealthy interest in kids? The same people cutting peepholes into school bathrooms?

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anyone who shows up to a school board meeting to complain about bathrooms should automatically have the police sent to look at their hard drive. If you’re that concerned about the bathroom habits of young children, the cops really need to look at your internet history and the contents of your hard drive.

      • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Drag wants to complain about bathrooms at schools. If we segregate the bathrooms at schools, we’re teaching kids that segregation is okay. We should be preparing the next generation to have less hangups and weird behaviour than we do. The kids already all have mixed gender bathrooms at home. They won’t think anything of desegregating bathrooms, and it’ll create a less sexist society.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If you’re gonna talk about desegregating bathrooms I think it’s important to talk about designing bathrooms for greater privacy as well. Ideally you don’t want a bunch of urinals lined up across from the sink / common area with no dividers in a desegregated bathroom. It’s a bad idea to just remove the signs on existing public bathroom designs and say anything goes.

          Also, why do you keep referring to yourself in the 3rd person?

          • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Drag isn’t referring to dragself in the third person. Drag has person independent pronouns. Most people have first, second, and third person pronouns for subject, object, and possessive. That’s 9 pronouns. Drag just has one. Much simpler and easier to remember.

              • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                Drag would appreciate it if you used drag’s second person neopronouns instead of saying “you”. Drag only has one pronoun, so it’s very simple to use and easy to remember, and drag’s pronoun is in drag’s display name.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 minutes ago

              For most people what’s familiar is easier to remember than what’s simpler. Personally I find drag’s comments difficult to parse. I’ll respect drag’s wishes regarding how drag wants to be referred to, but I expect drag’s going to have a lot of friction even with very tolerant and accepting people if drag insists on that pronoun choice.

              This video might be helpful for drag. I know the title is a bit clickbaity but I promise the person in the video is also tolerant and accepting.

              Edit: I went through and replaced all instances of you/your with drag. I think this is illustrative of the problem with drag’s approach. If everyone has to expend great effort simply to interact with drag in a respectful manner then that will lead to people becoming frustrated with drag. While drag’s identity is entirely drag’s business and no one else’s, drag’s insistence on a difficult/unfamiliar pronoun is a choice, and drag could make drag’s life easier by loosening up.

              • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 minutes ago

                Drag will watch the video, but drag wonders why the title uses a right wing name for the right wing, and a right wing name for the left wing. The video could use each side’s name for themselves, or each side’s name for the other side. But only using right wing terms makes it seem like the video has a right wing bias. Drag will still watch, but drag will do so with critical thinking.

                • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 minutes ago

                  I noticed that too when I first came across the video, but after becoming more familiar with this person’s content I saw that they lean progressive/inclusive and the title is like that probably just for the sake of clickbait or because they’re coming from a more centrist/liberal perspective and aren’t as familiar with leftist terminology.

                  I still think their perspective as a linguist is worth hearing.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, the people whose entire personality is combating the “woke liberal left”.

      You know, the people they portray is foaming at the mouth woke crusaders. When in actuality, 95% of left voters consist of people who don’t give a shit about all this besides listening to the oppressed minorities problems and proposed solutions, and showing the smallest amount of empathy.

      “Oh damn, I didn’t realize you dealt with that shit. Yeah, ok, gender neutral bathrooms are cool. Whatever you need, doesn’t bother me.”

      Right: “screeeeeeeee!!!”