Rockhill dives into the history and philosophy of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer to explain why the two towering figures of the Frankfurt School ultimately played the role of radical recuperators.
Rockhill dives into the history and philosophy of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer to explain why the two towering figures of the Frankfurt School ultimately played the role of radical recuperators.
Did you just skim the first paragraph and thought you understood the article? How is it ‘fedjacketing’ to point out Adorno’s and Horkheimer’s well-documented collaboration with CIA fronts? And how does pointing out different articles written by different authors prove anything? The Philosophical Salon is published by the LA Review of Books and publishes from different viewpoints. There’s no secret intention behind every article posted from that source.