• InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies didn’t remember he already endorsed one. He’s just too old and weird. He needs to drop out and seek treatment for his dementia. It’s sad.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    All three of age, Adderall, and syphilis are working together to create a powerful dementia inside this fella.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago
    Salon Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

    Salon is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left
    Factual Reporting: Mixed
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

  • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is usual for endorsements to be exclusive but that condition is not a requirement. There are good reasons to criticize that bloated party clown. This is not one of them.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Complete and total,” is what makes it idiotic, not simply endorsing two different people for one role.

      • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s nothing about “complete” or “total” that implies exclusivity. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, he was bound to stumble into a logically consistent position eventually.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I guess technically there is no implication, sure. Instead it is more like the literal definitions of “complete” or “total.”

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You are specifically choosing things that are not mutually exclusive in these contrived examples, come on.

              Of course this is stupid to argue about in the context of all the rapes and corruption he has done. You’re right that this line of discussion is dumb as heck. Get your last word in but I’m done. Thanks for snapping me out of it.

              • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Snapping out of it was all I wanted. This is nothing, even if I agree it is idiotic. There are much more important things to be talking about.

                That said, since you invited me to have the last word and because I enjoy having the last word: Contrived? Bruh. The salt and pepper was contrived, yes, as an underhand toss to get the idea of non-exclusion in without political charge. The other examples were specifically not contrived. Non-specific examples of the exact thing being examined. C’mon.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is there an example where two people running against each other were endorsed by the same person and it wasn’t a stupid thing to do for some reason?

      • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        i cant find another example of this sort of endorsement in a brief glance at google, which is not to say it hasnt happened before.

        just because it is not traditional doesnt mean it’s stupid. can you find another example of an american party switching presidential candidates at the last minute? it is as much as saying he doesnt endorse either, or that he’ll support the winner. it would be stupid if he was a normal person running a normal campaign, but hes not. hes a wannabe dictator who depends on doublespeak and confusion and lies and contradiction and insult. it works for him because the people who vote for him are stupid. it is smart to take advantage of stupidity. trump is playing both sides, so he always comes out on top.

        you know what is stupid? spending any amount of time at all talking about this fucking nothing burger. the man lead a coup. he ignored a pandemic because it was politically expedient to do so at the time. his mental calculus is not the same as yours or mine, it doesnt include morality or longer term planning than the next immediate personal objective. he rapes children and you wanna complain to me (in all unimaginative ignorance) that its stupid that he endorsed two candidates for the same race.

        i will give you props for actually replying instead of dropping a kneejerk hivemind disagreement downvote to fortify the opinion you came in with.