• hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 months ago

        Given this is the 1950s, it’s probably not even rent-seeking, I’m guessing the guys family was literally a small mafia extoring people for “protection money” lol. Like what else could “owning a fish market” entail?

          • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thing is where I was born to this day open air markets weren’t really owned by anyone. So like I assume the present day relationship has rentiers, but that particular relationship is relatively recent. So the violent process which privatized the markets and charged a rent (which was probably a protection racket of sorts) is likely relatively recent and that family was likely directly involved