• hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 months ago

      Given this is the 1950s, it’s probably not even rent-seeking, I’m guessing the guys family was literally a small mafia extoring people for “protection money” lol. Like what else could “owning a fish market” entail?

        • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thing is where I was born to this day open air markets weren’t really owned by anyone. So like I assume the present day relationship has rentiers, but that particular relationship is relatively recent. So the violent process which privatized the markets and charged a rent (which was probably a protection racket of sorts) is likely relatively recent and that family was likely directly involved