• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    One other reason- to protect those artifacts if they are in danger of being destroyed. I am all for protecting smuggled artifacts in danger of being blown up otherwise damaged or destroyed, as long as they are eventually returned.

    • ShaggySnacks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s the key, you need to return it or you’ll just become checks notes the British Museum.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m going to disagree with you. If someone had a classic car rotting in their yard, stealing it wouldn’t be justified even if you intended to restore it.

      Imagine if China scooped up the Lincoln Memorial and promised to give it back at such time we could properly care for it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m talking about in a war zone, not just rotting in someone’s yard. Hence “being blown up.”

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What do you think about the Taliban destroying 1,400-year-old statuary? Should we be sending them more stuff just to be destroyed?