• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The duality of their situation.

    You got the people who know the score and the true objective: To leverage a tenuous victorious position to tilt the scales persistently in their favor in a rather undemocratic way. For them, this is something to shut the hell up about and do on the down low.

    Then you have the true believers, who think this is a plan to clean up some perceived “deep state” conspiracy to cheat the elections, and only fair to “fix” the problem that the popular voice is not being honored. Those are the folks that wanted a big ol website for it and to shout it from the rooftops.

    Now of course, you’d think the true believers might get a bit rattled at the apparent eagerness to bury it and keep quiet and not tell the voters about it too much.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      And then we have the legions of young men who worship Andrew Tate that either openly support P2025 because “women bad” or act like it’s not a real thing.

      Yes, a 900+ page manifesto made by a think tank was made for the lulz.

        • ShaggySnacks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Like… do they even hear themselves? Hitler didn’t wait for the parliament to grant him power, he just declared it… and everyone just went with it.

          Really shows that checks on government actions only works when the checks do something and have the power to act on it.

          This is something inherent in Parliament based governments. In theory, the Prime Minister is suppose to be held accountable by their own political party. However, in reality the Prime Minister’s party just goes with whatever the Prime Minister says.