Link to the court ruling from the article (in German): https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/26_O_869_26_begl_Abschrift_Urteil_v_28_05_2026_Geschwarzt_Geschwarzt_Geschwarzt.pdf
Found the article on HN. The article itself is meh, but I couldn’t find any other site reporting on it.



Yeah. That little bullshit disclaimer at the bottom of every AI thing we have to intentionally ignore is doing a lot of heavy lifting, but is probably a really flimsy shield: “AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses,” says Google.
I have actually used gemini intentionally to answer a question, but the question has always been in the form of ‘where do I find info about XYZ’ instead of my real ask, because I can quickly validate that the response to question 1 is a reliable source, where validating an AI hallucination might take multiple times longer to refute than it did to produce.