• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They might be angling to do exactly that over a long period of time. It’s abundantly clear that Russia isn’t a real world power anymore. They need China more than China needs them. But there’s no reason to start a land war when you can slowly chew on them diplomatically over time.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They also don’t have much of anything China needs. Penalty the biggest value is in keeping other powers busy dealing with Russia. After that maybe oil and gas? Birch wood a distant 3rd?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Any number of other mines and deposits, and land that will get increasingly not terrible. It’s just a big area, there’s bound to be good stuff. Also they’re still butthurt about the lost Qing territory.

      • nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If we’re going to be credible: freshwater, energy, and people. Those are the 3 things China will take from Russia.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ahhh, I always forget about water. Even though that’s supposed to be the next east trigger (like Syria).