• blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Context clues my guy, when my feed is flooded with Genocide Joe memes because it’s an election year and various interests are trying to dissuade people from voting so Republicans take power, it’s pretty easy to tell what this meme is doing.

      • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        You think genocide Joe memes are to dissuade Republicans from voting for Joe Biden? You think someone concerned about genocide would vote for Trump for Biden? What?

        • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s about voter disillusionment. Make a big show about Joe Biden sending weapons to Israel equating that action to being the mastermind behind the Israel’s genocidal campaign and distracting from the fact that trump will literally open the floodgates of our weapons stockpile to Israel accelerating tje genocide and get people who begrudgingly vote for biden because he’s the less awful choice to reconsider voting at all.

          • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Do you think maybe this is something beyond just trying to get people to vote for Trump? Maybe people just really hate genocide and don’t like the idea of voting or supporting someone who is okay with it?

            Think maybe there are third party options?

            Do you think maybe the electoral college and the stupid voting situation in this country has made it so many people have an opportunity to vote third party while their state still goes to Biden??

            Listen all I’m trying to say is people have a ton of different reasons to call out Joe for his support of genocide. You immediately defending it makes you and the things you stand for look bad because you’re defending genocide. Just saying

            • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’m defending genocide by pointing out Republicans will accelerate the genocide if they win by people deciding not to vote?

              • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yes.

                If anytime someone brings up how the current political establishment are aiding and abetting genocide and that’s a bad thing and you immediately start defending them. You are defending genocide. 🤷

                That’s why I asked who said anything about voting for Trump. I’d shoot myself in the head before I did that. You know when I’m not going to do pretend like genocide Joe’s not a f****** genocide enabler. Cuz I don’t defend genocide or people who help commit them. You should try it real easy.

                • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Read what I’m saying, this kind of messaging not about convincing people to vote for trump, it’s about convincing people not to vote at all. Which always helps Republicans, and if they win, will 1000% accelerate the ongoing genocide. Doing nothing lets evil men get away with anything. And right now, for me, it’s about damage minimization and maintaining pressure to reverse the policy.

                  So no I’m not endorsing genocide by saying that trump getting into office will absolutely make the situation worse.

                  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I hear you. I’m going to try to be clearer

                    What I’m trying to point out to you is that you and many other people I see here as soon as anyone points out that the Democrats are backing a genocide and something needs to be done about it. Act like those people, including myself are supporting Trump or other Republicans.

                    All I’m trying to say to you is there are other strategies available and other reasons someone would not want to vote for Biden. Even in a way you might deem safe.

                    As soon as a criticism of Biden is made and there is a suggestion that something can be done about it, It is shot down by saying Trump would do it worse. This sentiment is used to stop people who want to stop the genocide. That’s why I’m calling it defending genocide.

                    We all know Trump would do it worse. Do not vote for Trump. Or any Republican they all suck. The thing I’m trying to get through is most of the Democrats suck too. If we continue to vote for Biden, another Dems, we’re going to get the same shit.

                    By instantly countering with someone who wants to do better by saying well, you’re actually going to do worse. You were defending the status quo and part of the status quo is genocide.

                    Do you get what I’m saying?

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Do you think maybe the electoral college and the stupid voting situation in this country has made it so many people have an opportunity to vote third party while their state still goes to Biden??

              Calculating whether you can safely throw your vote away to a third party candidate is a next level strategy.

              • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Yes, thank you! If you were to go through my comment history, you’ll see me arguing for voting for third parties in non-swing States. I also cite that if any of those third parties gets 5% in the vote, they get public funding in the next round as well as a chance to actually contend.

                My vote is probably going to end up going for Claudia de La Cruz or Dr. Cornell West. Because I live in a hard blue state that will not change.

                • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Another comment cuz I want to elaborate the problem is the Dems are controlled opposition. They pretend to be leftist and say they want to do the right thing but they never do. They’re always a couple votes short or just somebody turned on them or something always goes wrong. Obamacare was even a right-wing idea that came out of the heritage foundation. That’s why it sucks.

                  So solution we need an actual left-wing party. How do we do that without majorly screwing ourselves?

                  The only way I can think of outside of a violent revolution is slowly gaining control of a third party election after election to the point where it’s a viable contender and can win.

                  The only alternatives are violent revolution and continuing to pick the lesser of two evils and continuing to have the most important election of our lifetime so far every election. We need to do better. We need to organize.

                  Being complacent with where we are, especially with enabling genocide will only put us on the chopping block eventually.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You’re at a work retreat for a month, and management is taking a vote on what to get for food. Word is that everyone else is about 50/50 split between BBQ ribs, and pepperoni pizza. You’re a vegetarian, what you’d really like is Indian food, but the only ones interested are a handful of other vegetarians. If ribs win, you starve, if pizza wins, you spend the next month picking off pepperonis. How do you vote?

      Edit: lots of downvotes, but not a single answer. What a shock.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Again, no one said anything about voting for republicans. How about you try on this hypothetical:

        You’re president of the USA and the country that receives the highest amount of your foreign aid is committing genocide. If you continue sending billions in dollars and weapons then you lose votes, but if you stop supporting genocide, then you gain votes. How do you president?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 month ago

          But I’m not the president, I’m a voter. I’m not talking to the president, I’m taking to a voter. Hypotheticals about being the president offer no insight into beneficial behavior for myself or the one I’m taking to. Hypotheticals about voting strategy do.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 month ago

              No-genocide hasn’t been on the ballot for many, many years. Turns out, the voters who feel strongly enough about this particular genocide for it to affect their vote are a fairly small fraction with characteristically low turnout anyway. Sadly, not really worth actively pursuing as a candidate.

              Your choices are between measured diplomatic tolerance of genocide, and enthusiastic acceleration of genocide (with a couple other genocides thrown in too). It’s a close race. No genocide doesn’t have a chance, and voting no genocide increases the odds of enthusiastic acceleration of genocide.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 month ago

                No-genocide is on the ballot right now and it’s being made loud and clear, but biden is choosing to ignore it and people like you are trying to shame the people who care about genocide into not caring about it with hogwash like this:

                measured diplomatic tolerance of genocide

                That is a ridiculous string of words.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I care about genocide, which is why I’m trying to minimize it by preventing Trump from getting into office. Y’know, they guy who thinks Israel should’ve gotten it over with already? People like you are trying to shame voters into letting the guy who wants more genocide into office. Congratulations, you’re voting for more-genocide.

                  • Facebones@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I care about genocide, which is why I’m rewarding the guy sidestepping congress to supply and fund genocide with my vote. More genocide, please!

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            Don’t bother with them. They’re just a bad-faith actor who goes everywhere they can to peddle “Well, aktually, voting for MORE genocide is GOOD” bullshite.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Are you bragging about not understanding American elections, being an actual fascist, or deliberately voting against your personal interests? It’s gotta be the fascism right? Who would brag about being ignorant or counterproductive?

                  • ComradeVonStinky@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    None of the above. I understand how this country’s electoral system works. I’m also a socialist farthest thing that could be from a fascist.

                    Did you just throw a bunch of random questions out there because you’re a dumbass? Just kidding, I already know the answer is yes 🤣

                    Counterproductive to what genocide?