• OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, that’s a good rule of thumb. But in a huge group of anarchists i don’t know if the anarchist symbol is particularly identifiable.

      For real tho, if you’re out protesting it’s probably a good idea to cover your tattoos.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The commonality of symbol itself isn’t necessarily the point. If you have one that is easily identifiable (such as the anarchy sybmol) and the location is readily apparent, say on your left arm on your elbow, then that’s enough for them to go with to help with ID the person. While there may be plenty of the symbol around, the odds of a person of a certain age/sex/color having that same symbol in the same spot is pretty close to zero.

        Late edit: if you want to fool visual identification via tattoos, get fake tattoos that are visible and then remove them.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m guessing the intention here is that they’re fake, marker drawn ones. Still not great, but I’d think the artist who made this would at least understand that much if they understood rules like no phone, no pics, no talking to pigs.

    • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Fun /s facts i learned recently about Banksy:

      • intentionally does art near low income neighborhoods, thus gentrifying them to all hell
      • he built a hotel 4 miles away from the Gaza Strip that trivialized everything Palestine was going through for the past 78 years, and told a story of how the genocide is “a nuanced and debatable issue”
    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      May I know what’s the reason to not bring your phone? Is it due to concerns of being tracked?

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes. Even when your phone is powered down, some models still ping cell towers. If it pings one, they know your distance to the tower. If it pings two, both towers know your distance, and the overlapping circles would reveal two positions coordinates, one of which you were at. With some contextual information, it’s easy to know/prove which one you were at.

        If it pings 3 towers, your exact location, and unique identifying information sucha as your phone’s IMEI is revealed. So don’t bring a cell.

        • Synapse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Corporates are even bold enough to brand this as a nice to have feature, they call it “find my device” I think? But we can totally trust them to keep this data absolutely private and secure ! /s

  • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like, I get the point, but if you are too much of a coward to put your face with the cause, I am automatically assuming you don’t really care and just want the attention

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I thought the commentor meant the OP pic person was doing it for personal attention. Not attention for a cause.

          • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wait, I think I misunderstood you.

            Maybe attention isn’t the right word, basically I feel like you don’t actually support the cause, you just want to pretend you do.

            The people who actually care are willing to take those punishments and the sheer fact that they are willing to do so is what shows they care.

            Not showing yourself, shows a lack of dedication to your cause, you aren’t willing to sacrifice, other than some time, you won’t have any permanent consequences.

            It’s a “put your money where your mouth is thing.”

            They want to pretend they care to make themselves feel like they are doing something, but not sign their name for the cause.

            • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, if they arrest you that impedes your ability to continue protesting. There are reasons other than a lack of dedication to keep your identity protected.

              • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                The fact that you aren’t willing to take that hit shows a lack of belief in the importance of the cause.

                Obviously it matters to you, a little at least and for various different reasons, because you are out there, but the people that really care about their causes are full in their support of them.

                It’s like how so many people say they support something, but aren’t willing to sign their name to the petition.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, anarchists don’t force others to take arrest risks they’re not willing to. Everyone has their own tolerances and they can support the cause in their own way. Stop trying to pressure people.